Comparison between GMM and KDE data fusion methods for particle filtering: Application to pedestrian detection from laser and video measurements

S. Gidel, C. Blanc, T. Chateau, P. Checchin, L. Trassoudaine
{"title":"Comparison between GMM and KDE data fusion methods for particle filtering: Application to pedestrian detection from laser and video measurements","authors":"S. Gidel, C. Blanc, T. Chateau, P. Checchin, L. Trassoudaine","doi":"10.1109/ICIF.2010.5712051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In urban environment, pedestrian detection is a challenging task in automotive research, which often suffers from the lack of reliability due to the occurrences of spurious detections. In order to answer multitarget multisensor tracking problem and more specifically pedestrian tracking, we propose to use an algorithm based on a stochastic recursive Bayesian framework also called particle filter. We aim to solve the problem of consistent Bayesian Decentralized Data Fusion (BDDF) with particle filter using two different statistics approaches in order to better represent the particle set and maintains an accurate summary of the particles. We propose a comparison between a Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) based on non-parametric estimation and a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) based on parametric estimation. This approach allows to cope with non-linear models and multi-modalities induced by occlusions and clutters. These two algorithms differ in the representation of particle set during data fusion. Simulation results as well as the results of the experiments conducted on real data demonstrate the relevance of these approaches.","PeriodicalId":341446,"journal":{"name":"2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIF.2010.5712051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In urban environment, pedestrian detection is a challenging task in automotive research, which often suffers from the lack of reliability due to the occurrences of spurious detections. In order to answer multitarget multisensor tracking problem and more specifically pedestrian tracking, we propose to use an algorithm based on a stochastic recursive Bayesian framework also called particle filter. We aim to solve the problem of consistent Bayesian Decentralized Data Fusion (BDDF) with particle filter using two different statistics approaches in order to better represent the particle set and maintains an accurate summary of the particles. We propose a comparison between a Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) based on non-parametric estimation and a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) based on parametric estimation. This approach allows to cope with non-linear models and multi-modalities induced by occlusions and clutters. These two algorithms differ in the representation of particle set during data fusion. Simulation results as well as the results of the experiments conducted on real data demonstrate the relevance of these approaches.
粒子滤波中GMM和KDE数据融合方法的比较:应用于激光和视频测量的行人检测
在城市环境中,行人检测是汽车研究中的一项具有挑战性的任务,由于经常出现虚假检测而缺乏可靠性。为了解决多目标多传感器跟踪问题,特别是行人跟踪问题,我们提出了一种基于随机递归贝叶斯框架的算法,也称为粒子滤波。为了更好地表示粒子集并保持粒子的准确汇总,我们使用两种不同的统计方法来解决带有粒子滤波的一致贝叶斯分散数据融合(BDDF)问题。我们提出了基于非参数估计的核密度估计(KDE)和基于参数估计的高斯混合模型(GMM)之间的比较。这种方法允许处理非线性模型和多模态引起的闭塞和杂波。这两种算法在数据融合过程中对粒子集的表示有所不同。仿真结果以及在实际数据上进行的实验结果证明了这些方法的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信