IMPACT OF UNCERTAINTY, ANXIETY, AND DEPRESSION ON ONCOLOGY PATIENTS’ QUALITY OF LIFE: SOME EVIDENCE FROM BULGARIA AND ITALY

M. D. Giammanco, L. Gitto, S. Djambazov
{"title":"IMPACT OF UNCERTAINTY, ANXIETY, AND DEPRESSION ON ONCOLOGY PATIENTS’ QUALITY OF LIFE: SOME EVIDENCE FROM BULGARIA AND ITALY","authors":"M. D. Giammanco, L. Gitto, S. Djambazov","doi":"10.35774/jee2023.02.312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the present paper is to assess health-related quality of life (HQOL) of oncological patients. The treatment of cancer and of other invalidating and chronic pathologies cannot neglect the patients’ personal dimensions, let alone the uncertainty surrounding therapies and their effectiveness. Simultaneous consideration of all these factors makes it possible to identify the patients’ needs concerning their hospital experience, together with self-perceived health status, and to isolate crucial factors that improve patients’ satisfaction. For this purpose, health related quality of life (HQOL) was measured through the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the EuroQOL-5D questionnaire for the sample of 600 cancer patients who live in two countries (300 in Italy and 306 in Bulgaria). Another validated scale employed in the research explored uncertainty through the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale – MUIS, while other aspects related to cancer were measured through a tool developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). In the estimated Tobit model, a dummy variable was included among the regressors to control for the place of residence. The econometric analysis highlighted the need to account for relational and uncertainty-in-illness factors in the management of oncological diseases. Since both national sub-groups were not representative of the whole sample, we re-ran the same analysis for colorectal cancer, i.e., the most frequent type of cancer in Italy and Bulgaria both. The results of this second model only partially confirmed the main regression results, while the national effect lost its statistical significance. This suggests that the nature of the face-to-face relationships and the type of cancer under consideration matter more than the national institutional setting in providing a person-centered care.","PeriodicalId":278028,"journal":{"name":"Issue Vol 22, No 2 (2023)","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue Vol 22, No 2 (2023)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2023.02.312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the present paper is to assess health-related quality of life (HQOL) of oncological patients. The treatment of cancer and of other invalidating and chronic pathologies cannot neglect the patients’ personal dimensions, let alone the uncertainty surrounding therapies and their effectiveness. Simultaneous consideration of all these factors makes it possible to identify the patients’ needs concerning their hospital experience, together with self-perceived health status, and to isolate crucial factors that improve patients’ satisfaction. For this purpose, health related quality of life (HQOL) was measured through the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the EuroQOL-5D questionnaire for the sample of 600 cancer patients who live in two countries (300 in Italy and 306 in Bulgaria). Another validated scale employed in the research explored uncertainty through the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale – MUIS, while other aspects related to cancer were measured through a tool developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). In the estimated Tobit model, a dummy variable was included among the regressors to control for the place of residence. The econometric analysis highlighted the need to account for relational and uncertainty-in-illness factors in the management of oncological diseases. Since both national sub-groups were not representative of the whole sample, we re-ran the same analysis for colorectal cancer, i.e., the most frequent type of cancer in Italy and Bulgaria both. The results of this second model only partially confirmed the main regression results, while the national effect lost its statistical significance. This suggests that the nature of the face-to-face relationships and the type of cancer under consideration matter more than the national institutional setting in providing a person-centered care.
不确定性、焦虑和抑郁对肿瘤患者生活质量的影响:来自保加利亚和意大利的一些证据
本文的目的是评估肿瘤患者的健康相关生活质量(HQOL)。癌症和其他无效和慢性疾病的治疗不能忽视患者的个人因素,更不用说围绕治疗及其有效性的不确定性。同时考虑所有这些因素,可以确定患者对其医院经历的需求,以及自我感知的健康状况,并分离出提高患者满意度的关键因素。为此,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和EuroQOL-5D问卷对生活在两个国家的600名癌症患者样本(300名在意大利,306名在保加利亚)进行了健康相关生活质量(HQOL)的测量。研究中使用的另一个经过验证的量表通过Mishel疾病不确定性量表(MUIS)来探索不确定性,而与癌症相关的其他方面则通过欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)开发的工具来测量。在估计的Tobit模型中,在回归变量中包含一个虚拟变量来控制居住地。计量经济学分析强调需要考虑肿瘤疾病管理中的相关因素和疾病中的不确定性因素。由于这两个国家的亚组不能代表整个样本,我们重新对结肠直肠癌进行了相同的分析,也就是说,结肠直肠癌是意大利和保加利亚最常见的癌症类型。第二个模型的结果只是部分证实了主回归结果,而国家效应失去了统计意义。这表明面对面关系的性质和所考虑的癌症类型在提供以人为本的护理方面比国家机构环境更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信