Comparative analysis of endoscopic transnasal and microsurgical transoral odontoidectomy: Literature review and own experience

A. N. Shkarubo, Anton G. Nazarenko, I. Chernov, D. Andreev, Alexander A. Kuleshov, Nikolai A. Konovalov, I. Lisyanskiy, M. Sinelnikov
{"title":"Comparative analysis of endoscopic transnasal and microsurgical transoral odontoidectomy: Literature review and own experience","authors":"A. N. Shkarubo, Anton G. Nazarenko, I. Chernov, D. Andreev, Alexander A. Kuleshov, Nikolai A. Konovalov, I. Lisyanskiy, M. Sinelnikov","doi":"10.17816/vto321930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Odontoidectomy is indicated in the case of anterior compression of brainstem structures by an invaginated dentoid process, and it is currently possible to perform both transoral microsurgical and transnasal endoscopic access. \nOBJECTIVE: To conduct a comparative analysis of endoscopic transnasal and microsurgical transoral odontoidectomy performed by the first author. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The treatment results of 29 patients with pathological conditions, including anterior compression of stem structures with an invaginated dentoid process, were analyzed. Of 29 patients, 5 (17%) underwent surgery transnasally endoscopically, and 24 (83%) underwent surgery transorally microsurgically. \nRESULTS: Decompression of brainstem structures was achieved in all cases. The absence of the need to install a tracheostomy before surgery and the smaller volume of oropharyngeal trauma allow patients to undergo transnasal removal of the dentoid process and endure the postoperative period easier and faster. \nCONCLUSION: Currently, endoscopic transnasal access is gradually replacing transoral access in certain patients who are indicated for anterior odontoidectomy. Moreover, the literature analysis shows an ever deeper development of this technique; however, unambiguous indications of the use of transoral or transnasal access have not been formed at present.","PeriodicalId":308632,"journal":{"name":"N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/vto321930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Odontoidectomy is indicated in the case of anterior compression of brainstem structures by an invaginated dentoid process, and it is currently possible to perform both transoral microsurgical and transnasal endoscopic access. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a comparative analysis of endoscopic transnasal and microsurgical transoral odontoidectomy performed by the first author. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The treatment results of 29 patients with pathological conditions, including anterior compression of stem structures with an invaginated dentoid process, were analyzed. Of 29 patients, 5 (17%) underwent surgery transnasally endoscopically, and 24 (83%) underwent surgery transorally microsurgically. RESULTS: Decompression of brainstem structures was achieved in all cases. The absence of the need to install a tracheostomy before surgery and the smaller volume of oropharyngeal trauma allow patients to undergo transnasal removal of the dentoid process and endure the postoperative period easier and faster. CONCLUSION: Currently, endoscopic transnasal access is gradually replacing transoral access in certain patients who are indicated for anterior odontoidectomy. Moreover, the literature analysis shows an ever deeper development of this technique; however, unambiguous indications of the use of transoral or transnasal access have not been formed at present.
经鼻内镜与显微外科经口齿状突切除术的比较分析:文献复习与自身经验
背景:齿状突内陷压迫脑干结构的病例需要行齿状突切除术,目前可以进行经口显微手术和经鼻内镜手术。目的:对第一作者进行的经鼻内镜与经口显微外科齿状突切除术进行比较分析。材料与方法:分析29例病理情况包括牙状突内陷累及前压迫干结构的患者的治疗结果。29例患者中5例(17%)行经鼻内镜手术,24例(83%)行经口显微外科手术。结果:所有病例均实现了脑干结构减压。术前不需要进行气管切开术,口咽外伤体积较小,使患者可以经鼻切除齿状突,更容易、更快地度过术后时期。结论:目前,内镜下经鼻入路逐渐取代经口入路在某些患者指征前齿状突切除术。此外,文献分析表明,该技术的发展越来越深入;然而,经口或经鼻入路的明确适应症目前尚未形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信