A note on two simulation benchmarks

D. House
{"title":"A note on two simulation benchmarks","authors":"D. House","doi":"10.1145/84222.84228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note presents the results of a comparative study done on the popular simulation languages SLAM and GPSS. The models that we tested were executed on a CDC Cyber 750, a multiprogramming system with 3770008 words of main memory and no virtual memory. A single server queueing model and a multiqueuing model for simulating a token ring local area network were used for the comparison. In addition to SLAM and GPSS, we also develop FORTRAN versions of the models to obtain an idea of how a low level model performs in comparison to a model constructed in a well developed simulation language. The note includes a discussion and some graphical results that may be useful to a modelling practitioner in planning a simulation study.","PeriodicalId":138785,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigsim Simulation Digest","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigsim Simulation Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/84222.84228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This note presents the results of a comparative study done on the popular simulation languages SLAM and GPSS. The models that we tested were executed on a CDC Cyber 750, a multiprogramming system with 3770008 words of main memory and no virtual memory. A single server queueing model and a multiqueuing model for simulating a token ring local area network were used for the comparison. In addition to SLAM and GPSS, we also develop FORTRAN versions of the models to obtain an idea of how a low level model performs in comparison to a model constructed in a well developed simulation language. The note includes a discussion and some graphical results that may be useful to a modelling practitioner in planning a simulation study.
关于两个模拟基准的说明
本文介绍了对流行的模拟语言SLAM和GPSS进行比较研究的结果。我们测试的模型是在CDC Cyber 750上执行的,这是一个多道程序系统,主存为3770008个字,没有虚拟内存。采用单服务器排队模型和多服务器排队模型对令牌环局域网进行了仿真比较。除了SLAM和GPSS,我们还开发了FORTRAN版本的模型,以了解低级模型与用成熟的仿真语言构建的模型相比如何执行。说明包括一个讨论和一些图形结果,可能是有用的建模从业者在规划模拟研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信