Does Socio-Technical Congruence Have an Effect on Continuous Integration Build Failures? An Empirical Study on 10 GitHub Projects

Weiqiang Zhang, Zhenyu Chen, B. Luo
{"title":"Does Socio-Technical Congruence Have an Effect on Continuous Integration Build Failures? An Empirical Study on 10 GitHub Projects","authors":"Weiqiang Zhang, Zhenyu Chen, B. Luo","doi":"10.1109/QRS.2018.00046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coordination is important in software development. Socio-Technical Congruence (STC) is proposed to measure the match between coordination requirements and actual coordination activities, and has been proved to have impact on software failures in commercial projects. Continuous defect prediction is aimed to predict defects just in time, which is more meaningful than traditional defect prediction in practice. In this paper, we compute the build-level STC and investigate its usefulness in continuous defect prediction based on 10 GitHub projects. We find that adding STC metrics into logistic regression models can significantly improve both the explanatory power and the predictive power when predicting build failures. Furthermore, we compare the performance of STC and MDL from the aspects of regression and prediction. MDL is short for Missing Developer Links, a deviation of the STC metric. We find that MDL usually performs better than STC. Our work is promising to help detect coordination issues during real time process of software development.","PeriodicalId":114973,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2018.00046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Coordination is important in software development. Socio-Technical Congruence (STC) is proposed to measure the match between coordination requirements and actual coordination activities, and has been proved to have impact on software failures in commercial projects. Continuous defect prediction is aimed to predict defects just in time, which is more meaningful than traditional defect prediction in practice. In this paper, we compute the build-level STC and investigate its usefulness in continuous defect prediction based on 10 GitHub projects. We find that adding STC metrics into logistic regression models can significantly improve both the explanatory power and the predictive power when predicting build failures. Furthermore, we compare the performance of STC and MDL from the aspects of regression and prediction. MDL is short for Missing Developer Links, a deviation of the STC metric. We find that MDL usually performs better than STC. Our work is promising to help detect coordination issues during real time process of software development.
社会技术一致性对持续集成构建失败有影响吗?基于10个GitHub项目的实证研究
协调在软件开发中很重要。社会技术一致性(STC)被用来衡量协调需求与实际协调活动之间的匹配,并已被证明对商业项目中的软件故障有影响。连续缺陷预测的目的是及时预测缺陷,在实际应用中比传统缺陷预测更有意义。在本文中,我们计算了构建级STC,并基于10个GitHub项目研究了它在持续缺陷预测中的实用性。我们发现,在预测构建失败时,将STC指标添加到逻辑回归模型中可以显著提高解释能力和预测能力。此外,我们从回归和预测方面比较了STC和MDL的性能。MDL是Missing Developer Links的缩写,是STC度量的一个偏差。我们发现MDL通常比STC性能更好。我们的工作有望帮助检测软件开发实时过程中的协调问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信