Investigating How "Good" Characteristics' Presence Are Related with Questions' Performance: An Empirical Study on a Programming Community

C. Souza, José Remígio, F. Aragão, E. Costa, J. Fechine
{"title":"Investigating How \"Good\" Characteristics' Presence Are Related with Questions' Performance: An Empirical Study on a Programming Community","authors":"C. Souza, José Remígio, F. Aragão, E. Costa, J. Fechine","doi":"10.1109/BRACIS.2016.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social query is the practice of sharing questions through collaborative environments. In order to receive help, askers usually broadcast their requests to the entire community. However, the prerequisite to receive help is to have the problem noticed by someone who is able and available to answer. Previous works have identified a correlation between the characteristics of the questions and the outcome of receiving or not an answer. These findings suggest that there are some characteristics that are more likely to attract the helpers' attention. Our proposal is to analyze the CQA history to identify how these so-called \"good\" characteristics affect the performance of shared questions. Our results suggest that: (1) answered questions present more of these \"good\" characteristics than unanswered ones, (2) the more \"good\" characteristics are present in a question, the more people it attracts, (3) the more people are attracted by a question, the faster it will be answered and more responses will be received, (4) answered questions attract more people than unanswered ones, (5) difficulty does not play a role in attracting people.","PeriodicalId":183149,"journal":{"name":"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2016.060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Social query is the practice of sharing questions through collaborative environments. In order to receive help, askers usually broadcast their requests to the entire community. However, the prerequisite to receive help is to have the problem noticed by someone who is able and available to answer. Previous works have identified a correlation between the characteristics of the questions and the outcome of receiving or not an answer. These findings suggest that there are some characteristics that are more likely to attract the helpers' attention. Our proposal is to analyze the CQA history to identify how these so-called "good" characteristics affect the performance of shared questions. Our results suggest that: (1) answered questions present more of these "good" characteristics than unanswered ones, (2) the more "good" characteristics are present in a question, the more people it attracts, (3) the more people are attracted by a question, the faster it will be answered and more responses will be received, (4) answered questions attract more people than unanswered ones, (5) difficulty does not play a role in attracting people.
调查“好”特征的存在如何与问题的性能相关:一个编程社区的实证研究
社交查询是通过协作环境共享问题的实践。为了获得帮助,请求者通常向整个社区广播他们的请求。然而,获得帮助的先决条件是让有能力并且可以回答问题的人注意到问题。以前的工作已经确定了问题的特征和接受或不接受答案的结果之间的相关性。这些发现表明,有些特征更容易吸引帮助者的注意。我们的建议是分析CQA历史,以确定这些所谓的“好”特征如何影响共享问题的表现。我们的研究结果表明:(1)回答的问题比未回答的问题表现出更多的“好”特征;(2)问题中“好”特征越多,吸引的人越多;(3)问题吸引的人越多,回答的速度越快,收到的回答也越多;(4)回答的问题比未回答的问题吸引的人更多;(5)难度对吸引人没有作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信