Numerical Stress Analysis for Prediction of Crack Propagation Direction in Adhesive Layer

N. Al-Ramahi, R. Joffe, J. Varna
{"title":"Numerical Stress Analysis for Prediction of Crack Propagation Direction in Adhesive Layer","authors":"N. Al-Ramahi, R. Joffe, J. Varna","doi":"10.23967/composites.2021.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study outlined here is related to the prediction of crack propagation path in the adhesive layer of joints. Typically crack initiation is predicted from stress analysis while fracture mechanics deals with propagation [1]. The fracture mechanics for complex stress states does not have an analytical solutions and numerical simulation should be employed. Besides, the crack propagation occurs in small increments with changing directions and more than one numerical simulation may be needed for each step and fracture toughness in a form of critical Energy Release Rate (ERR) for different propagation modes is needed as input. Thus, the procedure becomes rather time and resource consuming. The current paper offers alternative methodology which is based on the analysis of stress state ahead of existing crack to predict direction of the crack growth. The double cantilever beam with similar/dissimilar materials and adhesive layer in-between them is chosen as an example and the stress analysis is performed by means of finite element method. It is shown that crack path may be predicted based on the maximum peel (hoop) stress found on the circle of fixed radius around the crack tip. The crack extension is modeled in incremental manner with step-by-step procedure. Only two increments from the initial crack in the adhesive layer are considered. The angle θ 1 between the pre-crack and maximum value of the peel stress defines direction for the first crack increment. The direction for the second increment is defined by angle θ 2 with respect to the first increment. Thus, two angles are identified: θ 1 - deviation from the horizontal pre-crack; θ 2 - second increment (see Figure 1a). The results are verified by traditional fracture mechanics approach to calculate work needed to close the crack increment (see Figure 1b).","PeriodicalId":392595,"journal":{"name":"VIII Conference on Mechanical Response of Composites","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VIII Conference on Mechanical Response of Composites","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23967/composites.2021.060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study outlined here is related to the prediction of crack propagation path in the adhesive layer of joints. Typically crack initiation is predicted from stress analysis while fracture mechanics deals with propagation [1]. The fracture mechanics for complex stress states does not have an analytical solutions and numerical simulation should be employed. Besides, the crack propagation occurs in small increments with changing directions and more than one numerical simulation may be needed for each step and fracture toughness in a form of critical Energy Release Rate (ERR) for different propagation modes is needed as input. Thus, the procedure becomes rather time and resource consuming. The current paper offers alternative methodology which is based on the analysis of stress state ahead of existing crack to predict direction of the crack growth. The double cantilever beam with similar/dissimilar materials and adhesive layer in-between them is chosen as an example and the stress analysis is performed by means of finite element method. It is shown that crack path may be predicted based on the maximum peel (hoop) stress found on the circle of fixed radius around the crack tip. The crack extension is modeled in incremental manner with step-by-step procedure. Only two increments from the initial crack in the adhesive layer are considered. The angle θ 1 between the pre-crack and maximum value of the peel stress defines direction for the first crack increment. The direction for the second increment is defined by angle θ 2 with respect to the first increment. Thus, two angles are identified: θ 1 - deviation from the horizontal pre-crack; θ 2 - second increment (see Figure 1a). The results are verified by traditional fracture mechanics approach to calculate work needed to close the crack increment (see Figure 1b).
粘接层裂纹扩展方向预测的数值应力分析
本文所进行的研究是关于接头粘结层中裂纹扩展路径的预测。通常,裂纹的起裂是通过应力分析来预测的,而断裂力学研究的是裂纹的扩展[1]。复杂应力状态下的断裂力学没有解析解,应采用数值模拟。此外,裂纹扩展以小增量方向变化进行,每一步可能需要多个数值模拟,并且需要以不同扩展模式下的临界能量释放率(ERR)形式的断裂韧性作为输入。因此,该过程变得相当耗时和消耗资源。本文提出了一种基于裂纹存在前应力状态分析来预测裂纹扩展方向的替代方法。以具有相似/不同材料和胶粘剂层的双悬臂梁为例,采用有限元方法进行了应力分析。结果表明,裂纹路径可以根据裂纹尖端周围固定半径圆上的最大剥离(环向)应力来预测。采用循序渐进的方法对裂纹扩展进行建模。仅考虑粘接层中初始裂纹的两个增量。预裂纹与最大剥离应力之间的夹角θ 1决定了第一次裂纹增量的方向。第二个增量的方向是由相对于第一个增量的角度θ 2定义的。因此,确定了两个角度:θ 1 -与水平预裂缝的偏差;θ 2 -秒增量(见图1a)。通过传统断裂力学方法计算闭合裂纹增量所需的功,结果得到了验证(见图1b)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信