KVell

Baptiste Lepers, Oana Balmau, Karan Gupta, W. Zwaenepoel
{"title":"KVell","authors":"Baptiste Lepers, Oana Balmau, Karan Gupta, W. Zwaenepoel","doi":"10.1145/3341301.3359628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern block-addressable NVMe SSDs provide much higher bandwidth and similar performance for random and sequential access. Persistent key-value stores (KVs) designed for earlier storage devices, using either Log-Structured Merge (LSM) or B trees, do not take full advantage of these new devices. Logic to avoid random accesses, expensive operations for keeping data sorted on disk, and synchronization bottlenecks make these KVs CPU-bound on NVMe SSDs. We present a new persistent KV design. Unlike earlier designs, no attempt is made at sequential access, and data is not sorted when stored on disk. A shared-nothing philosophy is adopted to avoid synchronization overhead. Together with batching of device accesses, these design decisions make for read and write performance close to device bandwidth. Finally, maintaining an inexpensive partial sort in memory produces adequate scan performance. We implement this design in KVell, the first persistent KV able to utilize modern NVMe SSDs at maximum bandwidth. We compare KVell against available state-of-the-art LSM and B tree KVs, both with synthetic benchmarks and production workloads. KVell achieves throughput at least 2x that of its closest competitor on read-dominated workloads, and 5x on write-dominated workloads. For workloads that contain mostly scans, KVell performs comparably or better than its competitors. KVell provides maximum latencies an order of magnitude lower than the best of its competitors, even on scan-based workloads.","PeriodicalId":331561,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"101","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3341301.3359628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 101

Abstract

Modern block-addressable NVMe SSDs provide much higher bandwidth and similar performance for random and sequential access. Persistent key-value stores (KVs) designed for earlier storage devices, using either Log-Structured Merge (LSM) or B trees, do not take full advantage of these new devices. Logic to avoid random accesses, expensive operations for keeping data sorted on disk, and synchronization bottlenecks make these KVs CPU-bound on NVMe SSDs. We present a new persistent KV design. Unlike earlier designs, no attempt is made at sequential access, and data is not sorted when stored on disk. A shared-nothing philosophy is adopted to avoid synchronization overhead. Together with batching of device accesses, these design decisions make for read and write performance close to device bandwidth. Finally, maintaining an inexpensive partial sort in memory produces adequate scan performance. We implement this design in KVell, the first persistent KV able to utilize modern NVMe SSDs at maximum bandwidth. We compare KVell against available state-of-the-art LSM and B tree KVs, both with synthetic benchmarks and production workloads. KVell achieves throughput at least 2x that of its closest competitor on read-dominated workloads, and 5x on write-dominated workloads. For workloads that contain mostly scans, KVell performs comparably or better than its competitors. KVell provides maximum latencies an order of magnitude lower than the best of its competitors, even on scan-based workloads.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信