Africa Cup of Nations- the Odds of Retaining Glory

A. Musopole
{"title":"Africa Cup of Nations- the Odds of Retaining Glory","authors":"A. Musopole","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3604126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focusses on describing the odds of the Africa Cup of Nations edition champions retaining the cup in the next edition using the percentage of players recruited to defend the cup that were also recruited in the previous edition, and whether the coach in the previous edition is retained or not. The paper considers the editions in the period from 1992 to 2017 to come up with a description of the odds. Only 11 records are considered. Since the sample is small, bootstrapping is used (case-resampling with resampling done 1000 times). Logistic regression model is fit using penalised maximum likelihood (to avoid bias due to using small samples). Results show that the expected odds of the champions retaining the cup when they have not retained any player and the coach who were recruited in the previous edition are about 1.850 to 3.031. For every 1% of players who participated in previous edition and are retained, the expected odds of retaining the cup decrease by about 94.12% to 95.08%. When the coach in the previous edition is retained the expected odds of the team retaining the cup are about 343.31% to 462.21% higher than when the coach is not retained. The difference in odds of retaining the cup in cases where a coach is retained and a coach is not retained is not significant when about 77.19% or more of the players who won the cup in the previous edition are recruited.","PeriodicalId":105668,"journal":{"name":"Development Economics: Regional & Country Studies eJournal","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Economics: Regional & Country Studies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3604126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focusses on describing the odds of the Africa Cup of Nations edition champions retaining the cup in the next edition using the percentage of players recruited to defend the cup that were also recruited in the previous edition, and whether the coach in the previous edition is retained or not. The paper considers the editions in the period from 1992 to 2017 to come up with a description of the odds. Only 11 records are considered. Since the sample is small, bootstrapping is used (case-resampling with resampling done 1000 times). Logistic regression model is fit using penalised maximum likelihood (to avoid bias due to using small samples). Results show that the expected odds of the champions retaining the cup when they have not retained any player and the coach who were recruited in the previous edition are about 1.850 to 3.031. For every 1% of players who participated in previous edition and are retained, the expected odds of retaining the cup decrease by about 94.12% to 95.08%. When the coach in the previous edition is retained the expected odds of the team retaining the cup are about 343.31% to 462.21% higher than when the coach is not retained. The difference in odds of retaining the cup in cases where a coach is retained and a coach is not retained is not significant when about 77.19% or more of the players who won the cup in the previous edition are recruited.
非洲国家杯-保持荣耀的可能性
这篇文章的重点是描述非洲国家杯冠军在下一届杯赛中卫冕的几率,使用的是前一届杯赛中招募的球员的百分比,以及前一届杯赛的教练是否被保留。该论文考虑了1992年至2017年期间的版本,以描述赔率。只考虑11条记录。由于样本很小,因此使用了自举(重新采样1000次的案例重新采样)。逻辑回归模型使用惩罚最大似然(以避免由于使用小样本而产生的偏差)进行拟合。结果表明,在没有保留上一届聘用的球员和教练的情况下,冠军卫冕的预期赔率约为1.850 ~ 3.031。每有1%的球员参加上一届比赛并被保留下来,卫冕冠军的预期几率就会下降约94.12%,降至95.08%。当前一版本的教练被保留时,球队卫冕的预期赔率比没有被保留时高出343.31%到462.21%。当聘用上一届杯赛冠军球员的比例达到77.19%以上时,留用教练和不留用教练的留用概率差异不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信