Why do some engineering students study alone?

Elizabeth Burpee, C. Allendoerfer, Denise M. Wilson, Mee Joo Kim
{"title":"Why do some engineering students study alone?","authors":"Elizabeth Burpee, C. Allendoerfer, Denise M. Wilson, Mee Joo Kim","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2012.6462350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper looks at undergraduate engineering students who have solitary study habits and do not frequently engage with classmates. These students, referred to as `academic solitaries,' explicitly state that they do not interact or study much with their academic peers and may find a sense of belonging elsewhere. Using a mixed methods approach (including interviews with students and surveys), our data show that while some students are happy studying alone and do so by choice (`preferred solitaires'), others universally express feeling like an outsider and study alone as a result (`outsider solitaries'). We argue that many of these outsider solitaries may be at risk of dropping out or changing fields over short, moderate, or long-term time scales. As part of our mixed methods study, we have identified a unifying set of indicators that can be obtained by survey at much lower self-select bias than recruiting students for interviews. We found that this approach allows greater success in identifying outsider solitaries at potential risk of dropping out. In this pilot study, we show that using these affective indicators in survey form can potentially allow practitioners to identify students at risk of dropping out long before they reach the point of leaving.","PeriodicalId":120268,"journal":{"name":"2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This paper looks at undergraduate engineering students who have solitary study habits and do not frequently engage with classmates. These students, referred to as `academic solitaries,' explicitly state that they do not interact or study much with their academic peers and may find a sense of belonging elsewhere. Using a mixed methods approach (including interviews with students and surveys), our data show that while some students are happy studying alone and do so by choice (`preferred solitaires'), others universally express feeling like an outsider and study alone as a result (`outsider solitaries'). We argue that many of these outsider solitaries may be at risk of dropping out or changing fields over short, moderate, or long-term time scales. As part of our mixed methods study, we have identified a unifying set of indicators that can be obtained by survey at much lower self-select bias than recruiting students for interviews. We found that this approach allows greater success in identifying outsider solitaries at potential risk of dropping out. In this pilot study, we show that using these affective indicators in survey form can potentially allow practitioners to identify students at risk of dropping out long before they reach the point of leaving.
为什么一些工科学生独自学习?
这篇论文着眼于那些有独自学习习惯和不经常与同学交往的工科本科生。这些学生被称为“学术孤独者”,他们明确表示,他们很少与学术上的同龄人互动或学习,可能会在其他地方找到归属感。使用混合方法(包括对学生的采访和调查),我们的数据显示,虽然一些学生喜欢独自学习,并且选择这样做(“首选孤独者”),但其他人普遍表现出像局外人一样独自学习的感觉(“局外人孤独者”)。我们认为,在短期、中等或长期的时间尺度上,这些局外人中的许多人可能面临退出或改变领域的风险。作为我们混合方法研究的一部分,我们已经确定了一套统一的指标,这些指标可以通过调查获得,比招募学生进行面试的自我选择偏差要低得多。我们发现,这种方法可以更成功地识别出有潜在退学风险的局外人。在这项试点研究中,我们表明,以调查形式使用这些情感指标可以让从业者在学生到达离开点之前很久就识别出有辍学风险的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信