A systematic review of working conditions and occupational health in home office

Milena Sina Wütschert, Diana Romano-Pereira, Livia Suter, Hartmut Schulze, A. Elfering
{"title":"A systematic review of working conditions and occupational health in home office","authors":"Milena Sina Wütschert, Diana Romano-Pereira, Livia Suter, Hartmut Schulze, A. Elfering","doi":"10.3233/WOR-205239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: In times of the COVID-19 pandemic, employees around the world may be practicing part-time telework at home. Little is known about the working conditions at home and its impact on the employee’s occupational health. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examines the working conditions at employees’ homes, the work-related disorders associated with working from home, organizations’ perceptions of ergonomics at home and how they support their teleworkers. METHODS: A search of electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Google Scholar, Open Grey, Pedro, PsychInfo, PubPsych, Scopus and Web of Science) was performed. Twelve studies were included in this review. RESULTS: The findings highlight the lack of ergonomic working conditions for home-based teleworkers. Furthermore, the results underline organizations’ lack of awareness regarding home-based policies, ergonomics programs and the health-related consequences associated with the absence of ergonomic support. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that home-based teleworkers have increased health risks. This assumption is substantiated by the fact that most of the included studies reported teleworkers who have experienced musculoskeletal issues. These results underline the necessity for implementing ergonomic design recommendations, especially for working at home. Further research is needed to understand the impact of ergonomics programs and workplace design for working at home.","PeriodicalId":319034,"journal":{"name":"Work (Reading, Mass.)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work (Reading, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In times of the COVID-19 pandemic, employees around the world may be practicing part-time telework at home. Little is known about the working conditions at home and its impact on the employee’s occupational health. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examines the working conditions at employees’ homes, the work-related disorders associated with working from home, organizations’ perceptions of ergonomics at home and how they support their teleworkers. METHODS: A search of electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Google Scholar, Open Grey, Pedro, PsychInfo, PubPsych, Scopus and Web of Science) was performed. Twelve studies were included in this review. RESULTS: The findings highlight the lack of ergonomic working conditions for home-based teleworkers. Furthermore, the results underline organizations’ lack of awareness regarding home-based policies, ergonomics programs and the health-related consequences associated with the absence of ergonomic support. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that home-based teleworkers have increased health risks. This assumption is substantiated by the fact that most of the included studies reported teleworkers who have experienced musculoskeletal issues. These results underline the necessity for implementing ergonomic design recommendations, especially for working at home. Further research is needed to understand the impact of ergonomics programs and workplace design for working at home.
对家庭办公室工作条件和职业健康的系统审查
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,世界各地的员工可能正在家中进行兼职远程办公。人们对家庭的工作条件及其对雇员职业健康的影响知之甚少。目的:本系统综述考察了员工在家的工作条件、与在家工作相关的工作障碍、组织对在家人体工程学的看法以及他们如何支持远程工作者。方法:检索电子数据库(Cochrane Library、Embase、Medline、Google Scholar、Open Grey、Pedro、PsychInfo、PubPsych、Scopus和Web of Science)。本综述纳入了12项研究。结果:研究结果强调了居家远程工作者缺乏符合人体工程学的工作条件。此外,研究结果强调了组织缺乏对家庭政策、人体工程学项目以及与人体工程学支持缺失相关的健康相关后果的认识。结论:这些发现表明居家远程工作者的健康风险增加。这一假设得到了以下事实的证实:大多数纳入的研究报告称,远程工作者都经历过肌肉骨骼问题。这些结果强调了实施人体工程学设计建议的必要性,特别是对于在家工作。需要进一步的研究来了解人体工程学项目和工作场所设计对在家工作的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信