{"title":"Philologie und Digitalität. Perspektiven für die Musikwissenschaft im Kontext fächerübergreifender Institutionen","authors":"Ulrich Konrad","doi":"10.25366/2020.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the qualitative spectrum of methods in the philological sciences is being substantially expanded, with far-reaching implications, through the integration of the empirical, quantitative, and evaluative possibilities of the Digital Humanities. The example of the planning and establishment of „Kallimachos,“ the Center for Philology and Digitality (ZPD) at the University of Würzburg, demonstrates how a research center in the field of interplay between the humanities and cultural studies, digital humanities, and computer science can bring about a surge of change by providing in-depth insights into each other‘s subjects and ways of thinking. It not only brings with it a new view of the epistemological interests of philology, its questions, its canon, and its key concepts, but also makes computer science aware of the ‚recalcitrance‘ of humanities subjects and thus confronts it with new tasks. The ZPD is the result of a systematic reflection on the digital transformation of philology, with its traditional focus on editing and analyzing, in order to advance this development both in terms of content and methodology. For example, the formation of linguistic conventions in speaking and writing about music in 19th-century composers‘ texts and in music journals would be an ideal subject for the application of digital methods of analysis and the development of new research questions based on them. Research networks that jointly develop and rethink methods on the level of data structures across disciplines are likely to be a proven means of preserving our own discipline in the future, even if this may occasionally be a relationship borne more by reason than by love.","PeriodicalId":342208,"journal":{"name":"Brückenschläge zwischen Musikwissenschaft und Informatik. Theoretische und praktische Aspekte der Kooperation","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brückenschläge zwischen Musikwissenschaft und Informatik. Theoretische und praktische Aspekte der Kooperation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25366/2020.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Currently, the qualitative spectrum of methods in the philological sciences is being substantially expanded, with far-reaching implications, through the integration of the empirical, quantitative, and evaluative possibilities of the Digital Humanities. The example of the planning and establishment of „Kallimachos,“ the Center for Philology and Digitality (ZPD) at the University of Würzburg, demonstrates how a research center in the field of interplay between the humanities and cultural studies, digital humanities, and computer science can bring about a surge of change by providing in-depth insights into each other‘s subjects and ways of thinking. It not only brings with it a new view of the epistemological interests of philology, its questions, its canon, and its key concepts, but also makes computer science aware of the ‚recalcitrance‘ of humanities subjects and thus confronts it with new tasks. The ZPD is the result of a systematic reflection on the digital transformation of philology, with its traditional focus on editing and analyzing, in order to advance this development both in terms of content and methodology. For example, the formation of linguistic conventions in speaking and writing about music in 19th-century composers‘ texts and in music journals would be an ideal subject for the application of digital methods of analysis and the development of new research questions based on them. Research networks that jointly develop and rethink methods on the level of data structures across disciplines are likely to be a proven means of preserving our own discipline in the future, even if this may occasionally be a relationship borne more by reason than by love.
目前,通过整合数字人文学科的经验、定量和评估的可能性,语言学科学的定性方法范围正在得到实质性的扩展,具有深远的影响。德国维尔茨堡大学(University of wurzburg)的语言学和数字化中心(ZPD)“Kallimachos”的规划和建立的例子,展示了人文与文化研究、数字人文和计算机科学相互作用领域的研究中心如何通过深入了解彼此的主题和思维方式,带来巨大的变化。它不仅带来了对文献学的认识论兴趣、它的问题、它的经典和它的关键概念的新观点,而且使计算机科学意识到人文学科的“顽固性”,从而面临新的任务。ZPD是对文献学数字化转型的系统反思的结果,其传统的重点是编辑和分析,以便在内容和方法上推进这一发展。例如,在19世纪作曲家的文本和音乐期刊中,关于音乐的语言惯例的形成将是应用数字分析方法和基于它们开发新的研究问题的理想主题。在跨学科的数据结构层面上,共同开发和反思方法的研究网络很可能是在未来保护我们自己的学科的一种行之有效的手段,即使这种关系可能偶尔更多地是出于理性而不是出于爱。