Rites and Rights

H. Scheffler
{"title":"Rites and Rights","authors":"H. Scheffler","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvzcz578.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History, as we know, has a way of repeating itself, though often with a twist. Some seventy years ago in the course of an attempt to assess as best he could the social relations of man to land in Aboriginal Australia, B. Malinowski (1913:150-51) found reasons to distrust Sir George Grey's claim that in certain Aboriginal societies 'individual property in land was the only positive' form of land holding. Grey and G.S. Lang, Malinowski argued, were to a certain extent inspired by a humanitarian tendency, namely to show that the Australian Aborigines were not quite without ideas of property in relation to land, and that they were wronged by the white settlers, and thus deserved compensation for the loss of their hunting-grounds.","PeriodicalId":254680,"journal":{"name":"Enemies of the People?","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enemies of the People?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzcz578.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

History, as we know, has a way of repeating itself, though often with a twist. Some seventy years ago in the course of an attempt to assess as best he could the social relations of man to land in Aboriginal Australia, B. Malinowski (1913:150-51) found reasons to distrust Sir George Grey's claim that in certain Aboriginal societies 'individual property in land was the only positive' form of land holding. Grey and G.S. Lang, Malinowski argued, were to a certain extent inspired by a humanitarian tendency, namely to show that the Australian Aborigines were not quite without ideas of property in relation to land, and that they were wronged by the white settlers, and thus deserved compensation for the loss of their hunting-grounds.
仪式与权利
正如我们所知,历史总会以一种方式重演,尽管有时会出现转折。大约70年前,B.马林诺夫斯基(1911:150-51)在试图尽可能地评估澳大利亚土著居民与土地的社会关系的过程中,找到了不相信乔治·格雷爵士的主张的理由,即在某些土著社会中,“土地上的个人财产是唯一积极的”土地持有形式。马林诺夫斯基认为,格雷和G.S.朗在一定程度上是受到一种人道主义倾向的启发,即表明澳大利亚土著并非完全没有与土地有关的财产观念,他们受到了白人定居者的冤枉,因此应该为失去狩猎场而得到补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信