Work-in-progress: Exploring the essential nature of engineering education through philosophical inquiry

Russell Korte
{"title":"Work-in-progress: Exploring the essential nature of engineering education through philosophical inquiry","authors":"Russell Korte","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2012.6462462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In regard to the ongoing efforts to reform engineering education, this working paper proposes the methods of philosophical reasoning and argumentation for constructing and analyzing educational beliefs about the ontology and epistemology of engineering and engineering education. Modern views of philosophy tend toward an instrumental perspective - one that believes that philosophy provides a rigorous method for describing and evaluating our understandings of knowledge and truth. Philosophical reasoning can help reconcile diverse beliefs resulting in more coherent and comprehensive statements about the nature of engineering and education. Employing philosophical reasoning in the articulation of one's philosophy of engineering education can lead to a more coherent and consistent statement about what it is that engineering educators aim to achieve. This paper briefly describes the methods of philosophical reasoning and argumentation introduced in workshops on the philosophy of engineering education conducted at previous FIE conferences. A follow-up workshop focused on these methods is planned for this year's FIE conference. The outcomes of the upcoming workshop will be included in a final version of this paper on the topic of developing a philosophy of engineering education.","PeriodicalId":120268,"journal":{"name":"2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In regard to the ongoing efforts to reform engineering education, this working paper proposes the methods of philosophical reasoning and argumentation for constructing and analyzing educational beliefs about the ontology and epistemology of engineering and engineering education. Modern views of philosophy tend toward an instrumental perspective - one that believes that philosophy provides a rigorous method for describing and evaluating our understandings of knowledge and truth. Philosophical reasoning can help reconcile diverse beliefs resulting in more coherent and comprehensive statements about the nature of engineering and education. Employing philosophical reasoning in the articulation of one's philosophy of engineering education can lead to a more coherent and consistent statement about what it is that engineering educators aim to achieve. This paper briefly describes the methods of philosophical reasoning and argumentation introduced in workshops on the philosophy of engineering education conducted at previous FIE conferences. A follow-up workshop focused on these methods is planned for this year's FIE conference. The outcomes of the upcoming workshop will be included in a final version of this paper on the topic of developing a philosophy of engineering education.
正在进行的工作:通过哲学探究探索工程教育的本质
针对当前工程教育改革的现状,本文提出了构建和分析工程教育本体论和认识论教育信念的哲学推理和论证方法。现代哲学观倾向于工具视角,认为哲学为描述和评估我们对知识和真理的理解提供了一种严格的方法。哲学推理可以帮助调和不同的信仰,从而产生关于工程和教育本质的更连贯和全面的陈述。在阐述一个人的工程教育哲学时,运用哲学推理可以得出一个更连贯、更一致的结论,即工程教育者的目标是什么。本文简要描述了在以前的FIE会议上进行的工程教育哲学研讨会上介绍的哲学推理和论证方法。计划在今年的国际工商联合会会议上举行一个以这些方法为重点的后续讲习班。即将举行的研讨会的成果将包含在这篇关于发展工程教育哲学的论文的最终版本中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信