Critical Posthumanism:

T. Botz-Bornstein
{"title":"Critical Posthumanism:","authors":"T. Botz-Bornstein","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv105bc2g.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Uncritical Posthumanism” celebrates the continuation of the human by non-human means (for example, a new techno-bio body) as well as the creation of a reality by “unreal” means. Posthumanists attempt to make the body more self-contained and energy-efficient, developing the interaction of body-technology and consciousness-digitality, biotechnology or bioinformatics. The mutual interference of body, consciousness and reality creates a new space of “Virtual Reality.” Critical Posthumanism attempts to disentangle the common characteristics of human reality and posthuman Virtual Reality and establishes communicative links between both by sticking to the conviction that simulation should never win over reality. Critical Posthumanism attempts to locate the human in the posthuman. This article analyzes the common points of Virtual Reality, biotechnology, and globalization by reflecting on the notion of the narrative. The existence of Virtual Reality, the gene-code, and globalization is due to the desire to elude any narrative and to express reality “directly.” Gene technology tries to grasp not a certain – temporally definable – stage of the entire process of generation, but the gene itself, as the essential quantity of generation that has no real place in generation itself. Globalization “globalizes” the globe and represents it as something that is neither the “real world” nor its narration but rather a new sphere that we have to accept as such. Critical Posthumanism defines the subtle differences between a Virtual Reality in the sense of a technological narrative and an existential Virtual Irreality that interprets the virtual in a more “human” fashion.","PeriodicalId":225745,"journal":{"name":"Beyond Tomorrow","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyond Tomorrow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv105bc2g.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

“Uncritical Posthumanism” celebrates the continuation of the human by non-human means (for example, a new techno-bio body) as well as the creation of a reality by “unreal” means. Posthumanists attempt to make the body more self-contained and energy-efficient, developing the interaction of body-technology and consciousness-digitality, biotechnology or bioinformatics. The mutual interference of body, consciousness and reality creates a new space of “Virtual Reality.” Critical Posthumanism attempts to disentangle the common characteristics of human reality and posthuman Virtual Reality and establishes communicative links between both by sticking to the conviction that simulation should never win over reality. Critical Posthumanism attempts to locate the human in the posthuman. This article analyzes the common points of Virtual Reality, biotechnology, and globalization by reflecting on the notion of the narrative. The existence of Virtual Reality, the gene-code, and globalization is due to the desire to elude any narrative and to express reality “directly.” Gene technology tries to grasp not a certain – temporally definable – stage of the entire process of generation, but the gene itself, as the essential quantity of generation that has no real place in generation itself. Globalization “globalizes” the globe and represents it as something that is neither the “real world” nor its narration but rather a new sphere that we have to accept as such. Critical Posthumanism defines the subtle differences between a Virtual Reality in the sense of a technological narrative and an existential Virtual Irreality that interprets the virtual in a more “human” fashion.
关键的操作性:
“不批判的后人类主义”通过非人类的手段(例如,一个新的技术生物身体)来庆祝人类的延续,以及通过“不真实”的手段来创造现实。后人类主义者试图使身体更加自给自足和节能,发展身体技术和意识的互动——数字化、生物技术或生物信息学。身体、意识和现实的相互干扰创造了一个“虚拟现实”的新空间。批判后人类主义试图理清人类现实和后人类虚拟现实的共同特征,并通过坚持“模拟永远不应该战胜现实”的信念,在两者之间建立交流联系。批判后人类主义试图在后人类中定位人类。本文通过对叙事概念的反思,分析了虚拟现实、生物技术和全球化的共同点。虚拟现实、基因密码和全球化的存在,都是由于逃避任何叙事、“直接”表达现实的愿望。基因技术试图掌握的不是整个世代过程中某个——暂时可定义的——阶段,而是基因本身,作为世代的基本数量,在世代本身中没有真正的位置。全球化将全球“全球化”,并将其表现为既不是“真实世界”,也不是其叙述,而是一个我们必须接受的新领域。批判后人类主义定义了技术叙事意义上的虚拟现实和以更“人类”的方式解释虚拟的存在性虚拟现实之间的微妙差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信