As for decision making rules based on research results while forensic science activities

S. Paraschiv, S. Onoprienko, I. Spasenko
{"title":"As for decision making rules based on research results while forensic science activities","authors":"S. Paraschiv, S. Onoprienko, I. Spasenko","doi":"10.32353/khrife.1.2021.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While forensic research, obtained results should be evaluated in order to ensure adoption of correct conclusion regarding the research object. For this purpose forensic experts should use established decision rules to substantiate a statement about conformity of an object or certain requirements, or parameters, or characteristics. Currently, the need to ensure that a decision is made based on results of forensic examination using the concept of decision rules is constantly increasing. Therefore, consideration of the issue of establishing rules for making decisions while forensic science activity at international and national levels is relevant. Relevance of this issue is justified not only by the requirements of ІSO/ IEC 17025:2017 for testing laboratories but by the requirements for the objectivity of expert opinion. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 recognizes that there is no single rule for deciding on conformity. In other words, in a specific situation there will be its own decision making rule. This also applies to forensic science activity. \nTherefore, this article purpose is necessary for forensic science activity to determine: \n \ngeneral guidelines for choosing appropriate decision-making rule; \ndirectives for determining the components of decision making rules depending on the object and the task of forensic examination; \nrules for applying certain requirements to the research results of carried out in accordance with requirements of research methods, research object and the type of quantitative or qualitative research. \n \nThus, this article defines and considers the process of establishing the rules for making decisions, criteria which the rules for m","PeriodicalId":340932,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2021.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While forensic research, obtained results should be evaluated in order to ensure adoption of correct conclusion regarding the research object. For this purpose forensic experts should use established decision rules to substantiate a statement about conformity of an object or certain requirements, or parameters, or characteristics. Currently, the need to ensure that a decision is made based on results of forensic examination using the concept of decision rules is constantly increasing. Therefore, consideration of the issue of establishing rules for making decisions while forensic science activity at international and national levels is relevant. Relevance of this issue is justified not only by the requirements of ІSO/ IEC 17025:2017 for testing laboratories but by the requirements for the objectivity of expert opinion. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 recognizes that there is no single rule for deciding on conformity. In other words, in a specific situation there will be its own decision making rule. This also applies to forensic science activity. Therefore, this article purpose is necessary for forensic science activity to determine: general guidelines for choosing appropriate decision-making rule; directives for determining the components of decision making rules depending on the object and the task of forensic examination; rules for applying certain requirements to the research results of carried out in accordance with requirements of research methods, research object and the type of quantitative or qualitative research. Thus, this article defines and considers the process of establishing the rules for making decisions, criteria which the rules for m
关于法医学活动中基于研究成果的决策规则
在法医研究中,为了保证对研究对象得出正确的结论,必须对所获得的结果进行评估。为此目的,法医专家应该使用既定的决策规则来证实关于物体或某些要求、参数或特征是否符合的陈述。目前,确保根据使用决策规则概念的法医检查结果作出决定的需求不断增加。因此,在国际和国家一级的法医科学活动中,考虑制定决策规则的问题是有意义的。这一问题的相关性不仅符合ІSO/ IEC 17025:2017对测试实验室的要求,也符合专家意见客观性的要求。ISO/IEC 17025:2017承认没有单一的规则来决定符合性。换句话说,在特定的情况下会有自己的决策规则。这也适用于法医科学活动。因此,本文的目的有必要为法医学活动确定:选择适当决策规则的一般准则;根据法医检查的对象和任务确定决策规则组成部分的指示;根据研究方法、研究对象和定量或定性研究类型的要求,对开展的研究成果适用一定要求的规则。因此,本文定义并考虑了建立决策规则的过程,这些规则为m
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信