2019/2020 Learning Centre Practice in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Report

J. Tanner, Xiaodan Gao
{"title":"2019/2020 Learning Centre Practice in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Report","authors":"J. Tanner, Xiaodan Gao","doi":"10.26473/atlaanz.2021/006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data on the services and staffing in tertiary learning centres are necessary for providing professional support for tertiary learning advisors (TLAs). Full scale surveys of Aotearoa New Zealand centres were conducted in 2008 and 2013. In 2019, a third survey was conducted to explore whether the identified trends were continuing and whether there were any changes. This survey was sent to managers and team leaders at 26 tertiary learning institutions in Aotearoa New Zealand. Four topics were investigated: 1) the professional status of TLAs; 2) learning centre organisation; 3) the services provided by TLAs; 4) trends and changes since 2013. In 2020, when the lockdown resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic meant all centres had to cease operating face-to-face services for an extended period, some follow-up questions about the impact of Covid-19 were sent to the respondents of the 2019 survey. This report presents the five main findings of the 2019/2020 surveys, and provides comparisons with the previous surveys. First, more TLAs had postgraduate qualifications, and more TLAs were given general/professional contracts than academic contracts. Second, fewer learning centres were part of libraries or teaching and learning development units. Third, centres provided a similar range of services, with an increase in pastoral and wellbeing support. Fourth, services were more embedded, and more were delivered in online/blended modes, particularly since Covid-19. Lastly, changes in learning centres’ structures and service delivery were due to institutional financial pressure and student needs. We make some recommendations, including changing some questions in future surveys, updating the ATLAANZ professional practice document regularly, and implementing a TLA accreditation scheme in Aotearoa New Zealand.","PeriodicalId":308740,"journal":{"name":"ATLAANZ Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATLAANZ Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26473/atlaanz.2021/006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Data on the services and staffing in tertiary learning centres are necessary for providing professional support for tertiary learning advisors (TLAs). Full scale surveys of Aotearoa New Zealand centres were conducted in 2008 and 2013. In 2019, a third survey was conducted to explore whether the identified trends were continuing and whether there were any changes. This survey was sent to managers and team leaders at 26 tertiary learning institutions in Aotearoa New Zealand. Four topics were investigated: 1) the professional status of TLAs; 2) learning centre organisation; 3) the services provided by TLAs; 4) trends and changes since 2013. In 2020, when the lockdown resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic meant all centres had to cease operating face-to-face services for an extended period, some follow-up questions about the impact of Covid-19 were sent to the respondents of the 2019 survey. This report presents the five main findings of the 2019/2020 surveys, and provides comparisons with the previous surveys. First, more TLAs had postgraduate qualifications, and more TLAs were given general/professional contracts than academic contracts. Second, fewer learning centres were part of libraries or teaching and learning development units. Third, centres provided a similar range of services, with an increase in pastoral and wellbeing support. Fourth, services were more embedded, and more were delivered in online/blended modes, particularly since Covid-19. Lastly, changes in learning centres’ structures and service delivery were due to institutional financial pressure and student needs. We make some recommendations, including changing some questions in future surveys, updating the ATLAANZ professional practice document regularly, and implementing a TLA accreditation scheme in Aotearoa New Zealand.
2019/2020新西兰奥特罗阿学习中心实践报告
为专上教育顾问提供专业支援,需要有关专上教育中心服务及人手的资料。2008年和2013年对新西兰各中心进行了全面调查。2019年,进行了第三次调查,以探讨所确定的趋势是否在继续以及是否有任何变化。这份调查是发给新西兰奥特罗阿26所高等教育机构的管理人员和团队领导的。主要研究四个主题:1)TLAs的专业地位;2)学习中心组织;TLAs提供的服务;4) 2013年以来的趋势和变化。2020年,2019冠状病毒病大流行导致的封锁意味着所有中心都不得不在较长时间内停止运营面对面服务,有关2019年调查的受访者收到了一些关于2019冠状病毒病影响的后续问题。本报告介绍了2019/2020年调查的五个主要发现,并与之前的调查进行了比较。首先,拥有研究生资格的教学助理越来越多,获得一般/专业合同的教学助理多于获得学术合同的教学助理。第二,属于图书馆或教与学发展单位的学习中心较少。第三,中心提供了类似的服务范围,增加了牧养和福利支持。四是服务嵌入化程度进一步提高,以在线/混合方式提供的服务更多,特别是新冠肺炎疫情以来。最后,学习中心结构和服务提供的变化是由于机构的财政压力和学生的需要。我们提出了一些建议,包括在未来的调查中修改一些问题,定期更新ATLAANZ专业实践文件,并在新西兰奥特阿瓦实施TLA认证计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信