Death in a multicultural society

D. Tay
{"title":"Death in a multicultural society","authors":"D. Tay","doi":"10.1075/COGLS.00031.TAY","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Obituaries are a tractable source of metaphorical depictions of death, which in turn offer unique insights into\n the near-universality versus culture and context-specificity of metaphors. In multicultural settings, they can shed further light\n on the underexplored question of how metaphor use interacts with linguistic and religious identities. This paper is a case study\n of newspaper obituaries (N = 337) in the multicultural and multilingual context of Singapore. It uses a\n mixed-methods approach to uncover the types of death-related metaphors across languages and religions, their near-universal and\n culture-specific aspects, and significant associations between religion and metaphor use/non-use (χ² (2,\n N = 337) = 84.54, p < 0.001, Cramer’s V = 0.501, Log\n (BF10) = 47.14), language and metaphor use/non-use (χ² (1, N = 337) = 71.2,\n p < 0.001, Cramer’s V = 0.46, Log (BF10) = 42.25), and religion and language\n of the deceased (χ² (2, N = 337) = 48.11, p < 0.001, Cramer’s\n V = 0.378, Log (BF10) = 19.7). The findings extend prevailing discussion from the substantive\n contents of metaphors to the intra-societal pragmatics of their use, connecting metaphor explicitly with the construction of\n religious and linguistic identities.","PeriodicalId":127458,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/COGLS.00031.TAY","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Obituaries are a tractable source of metaphorical depictions of death, which in turn offer unique insights into the near-universality versus culture and context-specificity of metaphors. In multicultural settings, they can shed further light on the underexplored question of how metaphor use interacts with linguistic and religious identities. This paper is a case study of newspaper obituaries (N = 337) in the multicultural and multilingual context of Singapore. It uses a mixed-methods approach to uncover the types of death-related metaphors across languages and religions, their near-universal and culture-specific aspects, and significant associations between religion and metaphor use/non-use (χ² (2, N = 337) = 84.54, p < 0.001, Cramer’s V = 0.501, Log (BF10) = 47.14), language and metaphor use/non-use (χ² (1, N = 337) = 71.2, p < 0.001, Cramer’s V = 0.46, Log (BF10) = 42.25), and religion and language of the deceased (χ² (2, N = 337) = 48.11, p < 0.001, Cramer’s V = 0.378, Log (BF10) = 19.7). The findings extend prevailing discussion from the substantive contents of metaphors to the intra-societal pragmatics of their use, connecting metaphor explicitly with the construction of religious and linguistic identities.
多元文化社会中的死亡
讣告是对死亡的隐喻描述的一个可处理的来源,这反过来又为隐喻的近乎普遍性与文化和上下文特异性提供了独特的见解。在多元文化背景下,它们可以进一步阐明隐喻的使用如何与语言和宗教身份相互作用这一尚未被探索的问题。本文是一个案例研究的报纸讣告(N = 337)在多元文化和多语言背景下的新加坡。它使用一个混合方法的方法来揭示死亡的隐喻类型跨越语言和宗教,他们的普遍和文化因素,重要的宗教之间的联系和隐喻使用/停用(χ²(2 N = 337) = 84.54,p < 0.001,克莱姆V = 0.501,日志(BF10) = 47.14),语言和隐喻使用/停用(χ²(1,N = 337) = 71.2,p < 0.001,克莱姆V = 0.46,日志(BF10) = 42.25),和死者的宗教和语言(χ²(2 N = 337) = 48.11, p < 0.001 ,克莱姆V = 0.378,日志(BF10) = 19.7)。研究结果将当前的讨论从隐喻的实质内容扩展到隐喻使用的社会内部语用学,明确地将隐喻与宗教和语言身份的构建联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信