HOW TO ASSESS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

P. Tagliani, Tatiana Walter
{"title":"HOW TO ASSESS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS","authors":"P. Tagliani, Tatiana Walter","doi":"10.2495/EID180051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of the Environmental Impact Studies, the determination of the significance of the impacts is a fragile aspect that has been the subject of discussion and criticism in the international scientific community. There are no objective criteria for such determination, resulting in very subjective evaluations, generally determined by the analysts’ experience and influenced by their professional profile. The commonly employed methods are derived from normative valuations using certain rating scales, which are used in the same way for quite different ecological, economic and social processes. Then, once a ranking of impacts significance values is established, the subjectivity of the process is hidden under a seemingly objective number. The proposed method establishes a simple routine of integrated analysis considering a set of characteristics of environmental impacts, including persistence, reversibility spatial amplitude, synergy magnitude, and cumulative effects. Although this method does not eliminate the subjectivity of the process, it makes explicit the criteria used for assessing the significance of impacts providing greater transparency to the process, contributing to a broader understanding of the profile of the impacts of the project.","PeriodicalId":217537,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact IV","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact IV","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/EID180051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the context of the Environmental Impact Studies, the determination of the significance of the impacts is a fragile aspect that has been the subject of discussion and criticism in the international scientific community. There are no objective criteria for such determination, resulting in very subjective evaluations, generally determined by the analysts’ experience and influenced by their professional profile. The commonly employed methods are derived from normative valuations using certain rating scales, which are used in the same way for quite different ecological, economic and social processes. Then, once a ranking of impacts significance values is established, the subjectivity of the process is hidden under a seemingly objective number. The proposed method establishes a simple routine of integrated analysis considering a set of characteristics of environmental impacts, including persistence, reversibility spatial amplitude, synergy magnitude, and cumulative effects. Although this method does not eliminate the subjectivity of the process, it makes explicit the criteria used for assessing the significance of impacts providing greater transparency to the process, contributing to a broader understanding of the profile of the impacts of the project.
如何评估环境影响的重要性
在环境影响研究的范围内,确定影响的重要性是一个脆弱的方面,一直是国际科学界讨论和批评的主题。这种判断没有客观的标准,导致非常主观的评价,通常由分析人员的经验决定,并受其专业概况的影响。通常采用的方法是从使用某些评级量表的规范估值得来的,这些量表以同样的方式用于完全不同的生态、经济和社会进程。然后,一旦建立了影响显著性值的排序,过程的主观性就被隐藏在一个看似客观的数字之下。该方法建立了一个简单的综合分析程序,考虑了环境影响的一系列特征,包括持久性、可逆性、空间幅度、协同幅度和累积效应。虽然这种方法没有消除过程的主观性,但它明确了用于评估影响重要性的标准,为过程提供了更大的透明度,有助于更广泛地了解项目影响的概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信