Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dengan Adanya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 13 Tahun 2016

Michelle Kristina
{"title":"Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dengan Adanya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 13 Tahun 2016","authors":"Michelle Kristina","doi":"10.24123/YUSTIKA.V21I02.1709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of the concept of corporation not only had a positive impact but also followed by the development of crimes that could be done using corporations or also called corporate crime. Many laws and regulations that have accommodated corporation as legal subjects that can be asked for corporate criminal responsibility have not been followed by regulations governing procedures or procedures for examining corporations as perpetrators of criminal acts. This is very necessary because of the differences in characteristics between corporate crime and other conventional crimes. Responding to legal requirements that have been very urgent and there are distinct challenges for law enforcers because of the different treatment, then the Supreme Court issues Supreme Court Rules No. 13 of 2016. The problem regarding the procedure for corporate sentencing involved in criminal offenses is not only talking about material law but also about formal law or its procedural law. One of the aims and objectives of its formation is to fill the vacuum of criminal procedural law which until now has not regulated the procedures for handling corporations that carry out criminal cases. Supreme Court Rules No. 13 of 2016 is a legal rule aimed at assisting law enforcement officials in handling criminal cases with corporate actors and/or their administrators. This then became one form of thinking that could be the basis for assisting in the formation of criminal procedural laws governing corporations.","PeriodicalId":367058,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24123/YUSTIKA.V21I02.1709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of the concept of corporation not only had a positive impact but also followed by the development of crimes that could be done using corporations or also called corporate crime. Many laws and regulations that have accommodated corporation as legal subjects that can be asked for corporate criminal responsibility have not been followed by regulations governing procedures or procedures for examining corporations as perpetrators of criminal acts. This is very necessary because of the differences in characteristics between corporate crime and other conventional crimes. Responding to legal requirements that have been very urgent and there are distinct challenges for law enforcers because of the different treatment, then the Supreme Court issues Supreme Court Rules No. 13 of 2016. The problem regarding the procedure for corporate sentencing involved in criminal offenses is not only talking about material law but also about formal law or its procedural law. One of the aims and objectives of its formation is to fill the vacuum of criminal procedural law which until now has not regulated the procedures for handling corporations that carry out criminal cases. Supreme Court Rules No. 13 of 2016 is a legal rule aimed at assisting law enforcement officials in handling criminal cases with corporate actors and/or their administrators. This then became one form of thinking that could be the basis for assisting in the formation of criminal procedural laws governing corporations.
2016年最高法院条下的企业犯罪责任方程式
公司概念的发展不仅产生了积极的影响,而且随之而来的是可以利用公司进行的犯罪或也称为公司犯罪的发展。许多法律法规将公司作为可以追究公司刑事责任的法律主体,但却没有规定将公司作为犯罪行为的肇事者进行审查的程序或程序。这是非常必要的,因为法人犯罪与其他传统犯罪具有不同的特征。为了应对非常紧迫的法律要求,由于不同的待遇,执法人员面临着明显的挑战,最高法院发布了2016年第13号最高法院规则。涉及刑事犯罪的公司量刑程序问题不仅涉及实体法问题,而且涉及形式法问题或其程序法问题。其成立的目的和目标之一是填补刑事诉讼法的空白,迄今为止,刑事诉讼法还没有规定处理执行刑事案件的公司的程序。2016年《最高法院规则》第13号是一项法律规则,旨在协助执法人员处理与企业行为者和/或其管理人员之间的刑事案件。这就成为了一种思想形式,可以作为协助形成管理公司的刑事诉讼法的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信