Inaugural Editorial: Welcome to ASCE OPEN

E. Taciroglu
{"title":"Inaugural Editorial: Welcome to ASCE OPEN","authors":"E. Taciroglu","doi":"10.1061/aomjah.aoeng-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much time has passed since Newton wrote to Robert Hooke in a 1675 letter, “If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants”—a metaphor that predates even Newton by more than four centuries. His distinct acknowledgment of others who paved the way for his own revolutionary work is remarkable in both its simplicity and humility. It was clear that others also deserved recognition, but in that statement, he implicitly acknowledged the power of scientific correspondence as well because, without it, he might not have even known there were giants around from whom he could learn. It is thus how science and engineering, including our own—and arguably the most senior of them all—civil engineering, make progress. We, often without personal acquaintance and almost always asynchronously, communicate and learn from each other, with sometimes decades or even centuries separating us. The conduits of these interactions are manifold, but the main one today is our peer-reviewed journals. The moniker implies printed matter, yet that format has all but evolved out of existence. Needless to say, just like our science, our journals do evolve. The latest development we are experiencing in the world of science and engineering communications is a steady migration toward open publishing. Simply put, open publishing is the practice of making information and creative works available to the general public without restrictions or cost. This mode of publishing offers many virtues that benefit both the creators and the consumers of knowledge and information. Open publishing spurs creativity and knowledge development by removing access barriers and bringing more people from diverse backgrounds into collaboration and cocreation. Otherwise, you might be less inclined to access an article from a neighboring discipline, or from the same discipline but a different country, if it required additional subscriptions. Open publishing can also benefit creators by giving them broader exposure and recognition (citations). By the same token, constructive criticism from a wider audience can help authors improve their work. Finally, open publishing reduces the barriers that prevent marginalized groups from accessing knowledge, which is a prerequisite for participating in knowledge production. In all, open publishing should accelerate the pace of inventions and discoveries in our community, and supporting and promoting it will enable a more informed, creative, and just society.","PeriodicalId":283846,"journal":{"name":"ASCE OPEN: Multidisciplinary Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASCE OPEN: Multidisciplinary Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/aomjah.aoeng-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much time has passed since Newton wrote to Robert Hooke in a 1675 letter, “If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants”—a metaphor that predates even Newton by more than four centuries. His distinct acknowledgment of others who paved the way for his own revolutionary work is remarkable in both its simplicity and humility. It was clear that others also deserved recognition, but in that statement, he implicitly acknowledged the power of scientific correspondence as well because, without it, he might not have even known there were giants around from whom he could learn. It is thus how science and engineering, including our own—and arguably the most senior of them all—civil engineering, make progress. We, often without personal acquaintance and almost always asynchronously, communicate and learn from each other, with sometimes decades or even centuries separating us. The conduits of these interactions are manifold, but the main one today is our peer-reviewed journals. The moniker implies printed matter, yet that format has all but evolved out of existence. Needless to say, just like our science, our journals do evolve. The latest development we are experiencing in the world of science and engineering communications is a steady migration toward open publishing. Simply put, open publishing is the practice of making information and creative works available to the general public without restrictions or cost. This mode of publishing offers many virtues that benefit both the creators and the consumers of knowledge and information. Open publishing spurs creativity and knowledge development by removing access barriers and bringing more people from diverse backgrounds into collaboration and cocreation. Otherwise, you might be less inclined to access an article from a neighboring discipline, or from the same discipline but a different country, if it required additional subscriptions. Open publishing can also benefit creators by giving them broader exposure and recognition (citations). By the same token, constructive criticism from a wider audience can help authors improve their work. Finally, open publishing reduces the barriers that prevent marginalized groups from accessing knowledge, which is a prerequisite for participating in knowledge production. In all, open publishing should accelerate the pace of inventions and discoveries in our community, and supporting and promoting it will enable a more informed, creative, and just society.
欢迎来到ASCE OPEN
自从牛顿在1675年写给罗伯特·胡克的信中写道:“如果说我看得更远,那是因为我站在巨人的肩膀上”——这个比喻甚至比牛顿早了四个多世纪。他对那些为自己的革命工作铺平道路的人的明确承认,既简单又谦逊。很明显,其他人也应该得到认可,但在那句话中,他含蓄地承认了科学通信的力量,因为如果没有它,他可能甚至不知道周围有巨人,他可以向他们学习。这就是科学和工程,包括我们自己的——可以说是其中最资深的——土木工程如何取得进步的原因。我们常常没有熟人,而且几乎总是异步的,彼此交流和学习,有时相隔几十年甚至几个世纪。这些互动的渠道是多方面的,但今天的主要渠道是我们的同行评议期刊。这个名字意味着印刷品,但这种形式几乎已经不复存在。不用说,就像我们的科学一样,我们的期刊也在不断发展。我们在科学和工程通信领域所经历的最新发展是向开放出版的稳步迁移。简单地说,开放出版是将信息和创造性作品不受任何限制或成本地提供给公众的做法。这种出版模式提供了许多优点,对知识和信息的创造者和消费者都有利。开放出版通过消除访问障碍,使更多来自不同背景的人参与合作和共同创造,从而激发创造力和知识发展。否则,如果需要额外订阅,您可能不太愿意访问邻近学科的文章,或者来自同一学科但不同国家的文章。开放出版也可以给创作者带来更广泛的曝光和认可(引用)。出于同样的原因,来自更广泛读者的建设性批评可以帮助作者改进他们的作品。最后,开放出版减少了阻碍边缘群体获取知识的障碍,这是参与知识生产的先决条件。总之,开放出版应该加快我们社区中发明和发现的步伐,支持和促进它将使社会更有见地、更有创造力和更公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信