Distrust in the heartland: explaining the Eurasian “Organization Gap” through the Russo-Chinese relations

Valdir Bezerra, Henoch Gabriel Mandelbaum
{"title":"Distrust in the heartland: explaining the Eurasian “Organization Gap” through the Russo-Chinese relations","authors":"Valdir Bezerra, Henoch Gabriel Mandelbaum","doi":"10.22456/2178-8839.113353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of Eurasia is one of the most important elements of geopolitics, dating back to the beginning of the last century, and whose development owes much to the works of geographers and political thinkers alike. Nevertheless, although comprising a big portion of the planet’s political space, this region suffers from a relative ‘organizational gap’, especially if compared with neighboring regions such as Western Europe and Southeast Asia for instance. This paper contends that the lack of an overarching political arrangement in Eurasia owes much to particular aspects of the Russia-China relationship, which encompasses Great Power aspirations and competing organizational schemesin the region. Different views about Eurasia itself, associated with a quest for leadership in regional institution-building, put both Russia and China on competitive tracks, essentially obstructing the formation of a broad political design in the broader continent. To substantiate our point, the present work applies certain concepts from historical institutionalism, whose mechanisms enabled a thorough evaluation of patterns of inception, continuation, and change of political institutions, alliances and principles affecting the Sino-Russian relationship over time, as well as its effects on Eurasia’s ‘organizational gap’ per se. ","PeriodicalId":105770,"journal":{"name":"Conjuntura Austral","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conjuntura Austral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.113353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of Eurasia is one of the most important elements of geopolitics, dating back to the beginning of the last century, and whose development owes much to the works of geographers and political thinkers alike. Nevertheless, although comprising a big portion of the planet’s political space, this region suffers from a relative ‘organizational gap’, especially if compared with neighboring regions such as Western Europe and Southeast Asia for instance. This paper contends that the lack of an overarching political arrangement in Eurasia owes much to particular aspects of the Russia-China relationship, which encompasses Great Power aspirations and competing organizational schemesin the region. Different views about Eurasia itself, associated with a quest for leadership in regional institution-building, put both Russia and China on competitive tracks, essentially obstructing the formation of a broad political design in the broader continent. To substantiate our point, the present work applies certain concepts from historical institutionalism, whose mechanisms enabled a thorough evaluation of patterns of inception, continuation, and change of political institutions, alliances and principles affecting the Sino-Russian relationship over time, as well as its effects on Eurasia’s ‘organizational gap’ per se. 
中心地带的不信任:从俄中关系看欧亚“组织鸿沟”
欧亚大陆概念是地缘政治中最重要的元素之一,可以追溯到上世纪初,它的发展在很大程度上归功于地理学家和政治思想家的工作。然而,尽管该地区占据了地球政治空间的很大一部分,但却存在相对的“组织差距”,特别是与西欧和东南亚等邻近地区相比。本文认为,欧亚大陆缺乏一个总体的政治安排在很大程度上要归因于俄中关系的某些方面,其中包括该地区大国的愿望和相互竞争的组织计划。对欧亚大陆本身的不同看法,加上对地区机构建设领导权的追求,使俄罗斯和中国都走上了竞争的轨道,从根本上阻碍了在更广阔的大陆上形成广泛的政治规划。为了证实我们的观点,本研究运用了历史制度主义的某些概念,其机制使我们能够全面评估政治制度、联盟和原则的开始、延续和变化模式,以及它们对欧亚大陆“组织差距”本身的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信