Identity Crisis and Inter-Ethnic Conflicts in Northern and Upper East Regions of Ghana

J. Gasu
{"title":"Identity Crisis and Inter-Ethnic Conflicts in Northern and Upper East Regions of Ghana","authors":"J. Gasu","doi":"10.4314/gjds.v17i1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines conflicts in Northern and Upper East regions of Ghana from the perspective of identity crisis in an ethnically heterogeneous section of the country. Notwithstanding the long periods of co-existence among the heterogeneous ethnic groups the melting pot effect has not emerged as attachment to primordial identity lines still prevail. This is most manifested between the traditionally acephalous societies and the chiefly societies. The relationship between these two societies has been antagonistic, especially as the acephalous societies seem to be besieged with identity crisis. The rejection of the chiefly hegemony is at the root of the identity conflicts. The cases examined in this paper illustrate two of such ‘wars of emancipation’ but with differential results. Whereas the Kusasi had been ‘successful’ in wrestling out of the chiefly hegemonic control of the Mamprusi, the Konkomba have not been all that successful against their antagonists. In both situations, however, the acephalous societies tend to slough off their past ‘anarchic’, systems to adopt and/or adapt the chiefly political culture. This adaptation has become the mode of assertion to redress the low social categorisation of the acephalous societies. It is concluded that observance of peace in two areas continue to be tedious as primordial cleavages are still alive. It is thus recommended, among others that the National Peace Council should work with stakeholders to sustain peace. \nKeywords: Identity, Conflict, Kusasi, Mamprusi, Konkomba","PeriodicalId":110495,"journal":{"name":"Ghana Journal of Development Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana Journal of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjds.v17i1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The paper examines conflicts in Northern and Upper East regions of Ghana from the perspective of identity crisis in an ethnically heterogeneous section of the country. Notwithstanding the long periods of co-existence among the heterogeneous ethnic groups the melting pot effect has not emerged as attachment to primordial identity lines still prevail. This is most manifested between the traditionally acephalous societies and the chiefly societies. The relationship between these two societies has been antagonistic, especially as the acephalous societies seem to be besieged with identity crisis. The rejection of the chiefly hegemony is at the root of the identity conflicts. The cases examined in this paper illustrate two of such ‘wars of emancipation’ but with differential results. Whereas the Kusasi had been ‘successful’ in wrestling out of the chiefly hegemonic control of the Mamprusi, the Konkomba have not been all that successful against their antagonists. In both situations, however, the acephalous societies tend to slough off their past ‘anarchic’, systems to adopt and/or adapt the chiefly political culture. This adaptation has become the mode of assertion to redress the low social categorisation of the acephalous societies. It is concluded that observance of peace in two areas continue to be tedious as primordial cleavages are still alive. It is thus recommended, among others that the National Peace Council should work with stakeholders to sustain peace. Keywords: Identity, Conflict, Kusasi, Mamprusi, Konkomba
加纳北部和上东部地区的身份危机和种族冲突
本文从认同危机的角度审视了加纳北部和上东部地区的冲突,该地区是加纳的一个种族异质地区。尽管不同种族群体之间长期共存,但熔炉效应并未出现,因为对原始身份界线的依恋仍然普遍存在。这在传统的头型社会和主要社会之间表现得最为明显。这两个社会之间的关系一直是对立的,特别是当头脑社会似乎被身份危机所包围时。对霸权主义的拒斥是身份冲突的根源。本文研究的案例说明了两种这样的“解放战争”,但结果不同。尽管Kusasi人已经“成功”地摆脱了Mamprusi人的主要霸权控制,但Konkomba人却没有那么成功地对抗他们的对手。然而,在这两种情况下,头类社会倾向于摆脱过去的“无政府”制度,以采用和/或适应主要的政治文化。这种适应已经成为断言的模式,以纠正低社会分类的头类社会。结论是,由于原始的分裂仍然存在,在两个地区遵守和平仍然是乏味的。因此,建议除其他外,国家和平委员会应与利益攸关方合作,以维持和平。关键词:身份,冲突,Kusasi, Mamprusi, Konkomba
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信