A comparative study between intravitreal ranibizumab and peripheral laser ablation in cases of prethreshold type I retinopathy of prematurity

Ahmed Mahmoud Hadi
{"title":"A comparative study between intravitreal ranibizumab and peripheral laser ablation in cases of prethreshold type I retinopathy of prematurity","authors":"Ahmed Mahmoud Hadi","doi":"10.4103/2347-5617.150211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab for treatment of prethreshold type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with conventional laser photocoagulation given for the same disease level. Subjects and Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, the charts of 16 premature babies, presenting from July 2009 to May 2014, were reviewed. All infants were diagnosed with prethreshold ROP (type 1). Patients received either intravitreal ranibizumab (0.625 mg/0.025 ml of solution) (group A, 12 eyes of 6 infants) or conventional diode laser (group B, 28 eyes of 14 infants), bilaterally. The main evaluated outcomes included time of regression, decrease of plus signs and incidence of recurrence. Infants were followed till 55 weeks postmenstrual age. The confidentiality of the patients was respected. Results: The mean age of the studied infants was 35.63 ± 1.58 weeks ranging from 33 to 39 weeks. The stage of ROP in the studied infants was either stage 2 in 7 cases (43.8%) or stage 3 in 9 cases (56.3%). The zones of ROP were zone I in 3 cases (18.8%) and zone II in 13 cases (81.3%). Group A had a mean gestational age (GA) of 36.6 ± 1.5 weeks, while cases in group B had mean GA of 35 ± 1.3 weeks. This was statistically significant (P = 0.037). The stage did not significantly affect the choice of treatment (P = 0.09). Looking at the subgroup analysis 66.7% (two cases) of cases with zone I disease were treated with intravitreal ranibizumab, whereas 69.2% (nine cases) with zone II disease were treated with conventional laser. The incidence of recurrence was not affected by the zone of the disease (P = 0.71) nor by the stage of the ROP or by the presence of plus sign (P = 0.29, P = 0.68, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups about the incidence of recurrence (P = 0.701). The mean GA for cases with recurrence of ROP (35.25 ± 2.6 weeks), did not differ significantly with the mean GA of the infants who did not suffer from recurrence 35.75 ± 1.2 weeks (P = 0.7). Conclusion: Both intravitreal ranibizumab and conventional laser were proven effective in the treatment of prethreshold type 1 ROP. Long-term favorable structural outcome may require extended observation and retreatment. Further large-scale studies are needed to address the long-term safety and efficacy.","PeriodicalId":201997,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Retina Journal","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Retina Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2347-5617.150211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab for treatment of prethreshold type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with conventional laser photocoagulation given for the same disease level. Subjects and Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, the charts of 16 premature babies, presenting from July 2009 to May 2014, were reviewed. All infants were diagnosed with prethreshold ROP (type 1). Patients received either intravitreal ranibizumab (0.625 mg/0.025 ml of solution) (group A, 12 eyes of 6 infants) or conventional diode laser (group B, 28 eyes of 14 infants), bilaterally. The main evaluated outcomes included time of regression, decrease of plus signs and incidence of recurrence. Infants were followed till 55 weeks postmenstrual age. The confidentiality of the patients was respected. Results: The mean age of the studied infants was 35.63 ± 1.58 weeks ranging from 33 to 39 weeks. The stage of ROP in the studied infants was either stage 2 in 7 cases (43.8%) or stage 3 in 9 cases (56.3%). The zones of ROP were zone I in 3 cases (18.8%) and zone II in 13 cases (81.3%). Group A had a mean gestational age (GA) of 36.6 ± 1.5 weeks, while cases in group B had mean GA of 35 ± 1.3 weeks. This was statistically significant (P = 0.037). The stage did not significantly affect the choice of treatment (P = 0.09). Looking at the subgroup analysis 66.7% (two cases) of cases with zone I disease were treated with intravitreal ranibizumab, whereas 69.2% (nine cases) with zone II disease were treated with conventional laser. The incidence of recurrence was not affected by the zone of the disease (P = 0.71) nor by the stage of the ROP or by the presence of plus sign (P = 0.29, P = 0.68, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups about the incidence of recurrence (P = 0.701). The mean GA for cases with recurrence of ROP (35.25 ± 2.6 weeks), did not differ significantly with the mean GA of the infants who did not suffer from recurrence 35.75 ± 1.2 weeks (P = 0.7). Conclusion: Both intravitreal ranibizumab and conventional laser were proven effective in the treatment of prethreshold type 1 ROP. Long-term favorable structural outcome may require extended observation and retreatment. Further large-scale studies are needed to address the long-term safety and efficacy.
玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗与外周激光消融治疗早产儿阈前I型视网膜病变的比较研究
目的:评价雷尼单抗玻璃体内注射治疗阈前1型早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)的疗效和安全性,并给予相同疾病水平的常规激光光凝治疗。对象与方法:回顾性比较分析2009年7月至2014年5月16例早产儿的发病情况。所有婴儿均被诊断为阈前ROP(1型)。患者接受玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗(0.625 mg/0.025 ml溶液)(A组,6名婴儿12眼)或常规二极管激光(B组,14名婴儿28眼),双侧。主要评价指标为回归时间、阳性体征减少率和复发率。婴儿被跟踪到月经后55周。病人的隐私得到了尊重。结果:患儿平均年龄为35.63±1.58周,年龄范围为33 ~ 39周。本组患儿ROP分期为2期7例(43.8%),3期9例(56.3%)。ROP为I区3例(18.8%),II区13例(81.3%)。A组平均胎龄36.6±1.5周,B组平均胎龄35±1.3周。差异有统计学意义(P = 0.037)。分期对治疗的选择无显著影响(P = 0.09)。观察亚组分析,66.7%(2例)的I区疾病患者接受了玻璃体内雷尼单抗治疗,而69.2%(9例)的II区疾病患者接受了常规激光治疗。复发率不受疾病区域(P = 0.71)、ROP分期或存在加号(P = 0.29, P = 0.68)的影响。两组患者的复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.701)。ROP复发组的平均GA(35.25±2.6周)与未复发组的平均GA(35.75±1.2周)差异无统计学意义(P = 0.7)。结论:玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗和常规激光治疗阈前1型ROP均有效。长期良好的结构预后可能需要长期观察和再治疗。需要进一步的大规模研究来确定其长期安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信