Automatic Equivalent Mutants Classification Using Abstract Syntax Tree Neural Networks

Samuel Peacock, Lin Deng, J. Dehlinger, Suranjan Chakraborty
{"title":"Automatic Equivalent Mutants Classification Using Abstract Syntax Tree Neural Networks","authors":"Samuel Peacock, Lin Deng, J. Dehlinger, Suranjan Chakraborty","doi":"10.1109/ICSTW52544.2021.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mutation testing is a testing technique that is effective at designing tests and evaluating an existing test suite. Even though mutation testing has been developed to be applicable and effective towards different types of software systems and programing languages for many years, wide industrial use of mutation testing has not yet been seen. One primary reason that prevents developers and testers from using mutation testing is the expensive computational cost. Specifically, the need to manually identify equivalent mutants is a major obstacle and makes mutation testing very time consuming and labor intensive. This paper addresses this limitation and proposes a machine learning-based approach that designs and trains an abstract syntax tree recurrent neural network model to automatically classify equivalent mutants during the process of mutation testing. A pilot study with 582 mutants shows that the proposed machine learning-based approach can automatically classify equivalent mutants with an accuracy higher than 90%. The approach can significantly save the manual effort and time spent on identifying equivalent mutants during the process of mutation testing.","PeriodicalId":371680,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","volume":"291 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW52544.2021.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Mutation testing is a testing technique that is effective at designing tests and evaluating an existing test suite. Even though mutation testing has been developed to be applicable and effective towards different types of software systems and programing languages for many years, wide industrial use of mutation testing has not yet been seen. One primary reason that prevents developers and testers from using mutation testing is the expensive computational cost. Specifically, the need to manually identify equivalent mutants is a major obstacle and makes mutation testing very time consuming and labor intensive. This paper addresses this limitation and proposes a machine learning-based approach that designs and trains an abstract syntax tree recurrent neural network model to automatically classify equivalent mutants during the process of mutation testing. A pilot study with 582 mutants shows that the proposed machine learning-based approach can automatically classify equivalent mutants with an accuracy higher than 90%. The approach can significantly save the manual effort and time spent on identifying equivalent mutants during the process of mutation testing.
基于抽象语法树神经网络的等效突变体自动分类
突变测试是一种有效设计测试和评估现有测试套件的测试技术。尽管多年来突变测试已经发展到适用于不同类型的软件系统和编程语言,但尚未看到突变测试的广泛工业应用。阻止开发人员和测试人员使用突变测试的一个主要原因是昂贵的计算成本。具体来说,需要手动识别等效突变是一个主要障碍,并且使突变测试非常耗时和劳动密集。本文针对这一局限性,提出了一种基于机器学习的方法,该方法设计并训练了一个抽象语法树递归神经网络模型,用于在突变测试过程中对等效突变进行自动分类。对582个突变体的初步研究表明,基于机器学习的方法可以自动分类等效突变体,准确率高于90%。该方法可以显著节省在突变检测过程中用于识别等效突变体的人工工作量和时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信