The Benefits of Relationship Lending in a Cross-Country Context: A Meta-Analysis

Vlado Kysucky, Lars Norden
{"title":"The Benefits of Relationship Lending in a Cross-Country Context: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Vlado Kysucky, Lars Norden","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2170601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relationship lending may create benefits for borrowers by reducing information asymmetries. However, empirical evidence is mixed. We conduct a meta-analysis to summarize and explain the heterogeneity in the results in the literature using hand-collected information from 101 studies in the United States, Europe, Asia, and Latin America from 1970 to 2010. We find that strong relationships are generally beneficial for borrowers, but lending outcomes differ across the relationships’ dimensions. Long-lasting, exclusive, and synergy-creating bank relationships are associated with higher credit volume and lower loan rates. These benefits are more likely in the United States and in countries where bank competition is high. They are not related to the importance of small and medium-sized enterprises in an economy, suggesting that prevalence of relationship lending does not necessarily come along with borrower benefits. Our inferences are robust when we control for observed systematic heterogeneity in the original studies and hold in a bootstrapping analysis.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2088 . This paper was accepted by Wei Jiang, finance .","PeriodicalId":420844,"journal":{"name":"INTL: Economic & Financial Issues (Topic)","volume":"16 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"193","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTL: Economic & Financial Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2170601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 193

Abstract

Relationship lending may create benefits for borrowers by reducing information asymmetries. However, empirical evidence is mixed. We conduct a meta-analysis to summarize and explain the heterogeneity in the results in the literature using hand-collected information from 101 studies in the United States, Europe, Asia, and Latin America from 1970 to 2010. We find that strong relationships are generally beneficial for borrowers, but lending outcomes differ across the relationships’ dimensions. Long-lasting, exclusive, and synergy-creating bank relationships are associated with higher credit volume and lower loan rates. These benefits are more likely in the United States and in countries where bank competition is high. They are not related to the importance of small and medium-sized enterprises in an economy, suggesting that prevalence of relationship lending does not necessarily come along with borrower benefits. Our inferences are robust when we control for observed systematic heterogeneity in the original studies and hold in a bootstrapping analysis.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2088 . This paper was accepted by Wei Jiang, finance .
跨国背景下关系借贷的收益:一项元分析
关系借贷可以通过减少信息不对称为借款人创造利益。然而,经验证据好坏参半。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,利用1970年至2010年在美国、欧洲、亚洲和拉丁美洲进行的101项研究的手工收集信息,总结和解释了文献结果的异质性。我们发现,牢固的关系通常对借款人有利,但贷款结果因关系的不同而不同。持久的、排他性的、创造协同效应的银行关系与更高的信贷量和更低的贷款利率有关。这些好处在美国和银行竞争激烈的国家更有可能实现。它们与中小企业在经济中的重要性无关,这表明关系贷款的盛行并不一定会给借款人带来好处。当我们控制原始研究中观察到的系统异质性并进行自举分析时,我们的推断是稳健的。作为补充资料的数据可在http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2088上获得。本文被财经魏江接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信