Herbivory by Atta vollenweideri: Reviewing the significance of grass-cutting ants as a pest of livestock

J. Sabattini, M. Bollazzi
{"title":"Herbivory by Atta vollenweideri: Reviewing the significance of grass-cutting ants as a pest of livestock","authors":"J. Sabattini, M. Bollazzi","doi":"10.3389/finsc.2023.1101445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The grass-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri is well suited for studies examining the negative effect leaf-cutting ants have on livestock production in South American grasslands because they forage on the same plants as cattle. This study investigated the impact of A. vollenweideri on livestock production in Argentinean rangelands. First, we assessed A. vollenweideri herbivory rates and its economic injury level (EIL). Second, using satellite imagery in a region covering 15,000 ha, we estimated the percentage of this area that surpassed the calculated EIL. Results showed that A. vollenweideri consumed approximately 276 kg of dry plant weight/ha/year, foraging mostly on grasses (70%). Additionally, ants cut 25% of herbs and 5% of trees. In summer and autumn, ants consumed more grasses, while in winter and spring, herbs and trees were also significantly cut. Ants consumed 7% of the forage demand needed to raise a calf according to the management regime applied by farmers. Our calculated EIL (5.85 nests/ha) falls in the range of previous studies. Colonies were absent in 93.6% of the surveyed area, while their density was below the EIL in 6.2% of the area. A. vollenweideri populations surpassed the EIL in only 0.2% of the area, which corresponds to 2.6% of the locations holding colonies. These results question the perception that Atta leaf-cutting ants are a pest of livestock production. Although ants consume a small percentage of cattle’s forage demand, evidence that ants and cattle are competing in the few cases in which density surpasses the EIL is arguable. First, grass-cutting ants are capable of consuming herbs and trees in addition to the grasses on which cattle mostly feed. Second, there is no evidence indicating that both are cutting the same plant portions when preferences overlap. Third, evidence suggests that ants are not displaced under high-pressure grazing regimes by cattle. In the countries where A. vollenweideri is present, decision makers have promulgated several acts making its control mandatory. It is time to revisit the pest status of A. vollenweideri and include the use of EIL as a control criterion.","PeriodicalId":106657,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Insect Science","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2023.1101445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The grass-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri is well suited for studies examining the negative effect leaf-cutting ants have on livestock production in South American grasslands because they forage on the same plants as cattle. This study investigated the impact of A. vollenweideri on livestock production in Argentinean rangelands. First, we assessed A. vollenweideri herbivory rates and its economic injury level (EIL). Second, using satellite imagery in a region covering 15,000 ha, we estimated the percentage of this area that surpassed the calculated EIL. Results showed that A. vollenweideri consumed approximately 276 kg of dry plant weight/ha/year, foraging mostly on grasses (70%). Additionally, ants cut 25% of herbs and 5% of trees. In summer and autumn, ants consumed more grasses, while in winter and spring, herbs and trees were also significantly cut. Ants consumed 7% of the forage demand needed to raise a calf according to the management regime applied by farmers. Our calculated EIL (5.85 nests/ha) falls in the range of previous studies. Colonies were absent in 93.6% of the surveyed area, while their density was below the EIL in 6.2% of the area. A. vollenweideri populations surpassed the EIL in only 0.2% of the area, which corresponds to 2.6% of the locations holding colonies. These results question the perception that Atta leaf-cutting ants are a pest of livestock production. Although ants consume a small percentage of cattle’s forage demand, evidence that ants and cattle are competing in the few cases in which density surpasses the EIL is arguable. First, grass-cutting ants are capable of consuming herbs and trees in addition to the grasses on which cattle mostly feed. Second, there is no evidence indicating that both are cutting the same plant portions when preferences overlap. Third, evidence suggests that ants are not displaced under high-pressure grazing regimes by cattle. In the countries where A. vollenweideri is present, decision makers have promulgated several acts making its control mandatory. It is time to revisit the pest status of A. vollenweideri and include the use of EIL as a control criterion.
草食:回顾割草蚁作为家畜害虫的意义
割草蚁Atta vollenweideri非常适合用于研究割叶蚁对南美草原牲畜生产的负面影响,因为它们和牛吃同样的植物。本研究调查了阿根廷放牧区A. vollenweideri对畜牧业生产的影响。首先,我们评估了黄颡鱼的草食率和经济伤害水平(EIL)。其次,利用1.5万公顷区域的卫星图像,我们估算出该区域超过EIL的百分比。结果表明:扁叶菊对干株重/公顷/年的消耗约为276 kg,主要以禾草为食(70%);此外,蚂蚁还砍伐了25%的草本植物和5%的树木。在夏秋两季,蚂蚁对草类的消耗较多,而在冬春两季,草本植物和树木的消耗也较多。根据农民采用的管理制度,蚂蚁消耗了饲养小牛所需饲料的7%。我们计算的EIL(5.85个巢/公顷)落在以往研究的范围内。93.6%的调查区无菌落,6.2%的调查区密度低于EIL。只有0.2%的区域的种群数量超过EIL,这相当于2.6%的种群数量超过EIL。这些结果质疑了阿塔切叶蚁是牲畜生产害虫的看法。虽然蚂蚁消耗了牛饲料需求的一小部分,但有证据表明,在密度超过EIL的少数情况下,蚂蚁和牛正在竞争,这是有争议的。首先,割草蚁除了吃牛主要吃的草外,还能吃草本植物和树木。其次,没有证据表明,当偏好重叠时,两者会切割相同的植物部分。第三,有证据表明,在高压放牧制度下,蚂蚁不会被牛取代。在棉铃虫存在的国家,决策者颁布了几项法案,强制控制棉铃虫。是时候重新审视扁扁姬螨的害虫状况,并将农药残留作为一种控制标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信