State Variation in Railroad Wheat Rates

M. Babcock, M. McKamey, Phillip G. Gayle
{"title":"State Variation in Railroad Wheat Rates","authors":"M. Babcock, M. McKamey, Phillip G. Gayle","doi":"10.5399/OSU/JTRF.53.3.4255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wheat shippers in the Central Plains states have no cost effective transportation alternative to railroads. Wheat produced in these areas moves long distances to domestic processing and consumption locations or to ports for export. Wheat shippers in the Great Plains don’t have direct access to barge loading locations and trucks provide no intermodal competition for these movements. Wheat shippers in Montana and North Dakota are highly dependent on rail transport because they are distant from barge loading locations and intra-railroad competition is limited. In North Dakota, the BNSF controls 78% of the Class I rail mileage, and in Montana, the BNSF controls 94%. Montana ships nearly 100% of its wheat by rail. Unlike Montana and North Dakota, the BNSF and UP have roughly equal track mileage in Kansas. The BNSF has 44% of the Class I rail mileage and the UP, 55%. Also, both railroads serve the major Kansas grain storage and market centers. A 2010 USDA study found that in 1988, Montana and North Dakota had the highest rail grain revenue per ton-mile of the 10 major grain producing states. By 2007 this was no longer the case. The overall objective of the paper is to investigate railroad pricing behavior for the shipment of North Dakota, Kansas, and Montana wheat. Specific objectives include (1) develop a model to measure the impacts of railroad costs and competition on rail wheat rates for North Dakota, Kansas, and Montana, (2) identify and measure the major cost determinants of rail wheat prices, and (3) measure intermodal competition by comparing rail wheat rates in captive markets (Montana and North Dakota) to one with more intermodal competition (Kansas). The results indicate that there is little difference in average Montana and Kansas rail wheat rates per ton-mile. However, North Dakota average railroad wheat prices per-ton mile are higher than average Kansas rates per ton-mile.","PeriodicalId":405535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Transportation Research Forum","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Transportation Research Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5399/OSU/JTRF.53.3.4255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Wheat shippers in the Central Plains states have no cost effective transportation alternative to railroads. Wheat produced in these areas moves long distances to domestic processing and consumption locations or to ports for export. Wheat shippers in the Great Plains don’t have direct access to barge loading locations and trucks provide no intermodal competition for these movements. Wheat shippers in Montana and North Dakota are highly dependent on rail transport because they are distant from barge loading locations and intra-railroad competition is limited. In North Dakota, the BNSF controls 78% of the Class I rail mileage, and in Montana, the BNSF controls 94%. Montana ships nearly 100% of its wheat by rail. Unlike Montana and North Dakota, the BNSF and UP have roughly equal track mileage in Kansas. The BNSF has 44% of the Class I rail mileage and the UP, 55%. Also, both railroads serve the major Kansas grain storage and market centers. A 2010 USDA study found that in 1988, Montana and North Dakota had the highest rail grain revenue per ton-mile of the 10 major grain producing states. By 2007 this was no longer the case. The overall objective of the paper is to investigate railroad pricing behavior for the shipment of North Dakota, Kansas, and Montana wheat. Specific objectives include (1) develop a model to measure the impacts of railroad costs and competition on rail wheat rates for North Dakota, Kansas, and Montana, (2) identify and measure the major cost determinants of rail wheat prices, and (3) measure intermodal competition by comparing rail wheat rates in captive markets (Montana and North Dakota) to one with more intermodal competition (Kansas). The results indicate that there is little difference in average Montana and Kansas rail wheat rates per ton-mile. However, North Dakota average railroad wheat prices per-ton mile are higher than average Kansas rates per ton-mile.
铁路小麦价格的各州差异
中部平原各州的小麦托运人没有成本效益高的铁路运输替代品。这些地区生产的小麦长途运输到国内加工和消费地点或出口港口。大平原地区的小麦托运人无法直接进入驳船装载地点,卡车也无法为这些运输提供多式联运竞争。蒙大拿州和北达科他州的小麦托运人高度依赖铁路运输,因为他们远离驳船装载地点,铁路内部竞争有限。在北达科他州,BNSF控制了78%的一级铁路里程,在蒙大拿州,BNSF控制了94%。蒙大拿州几乎100%的小麦都是通过铁路运输的。与蒙大拿州和北达科他州不同,BNSF和UP在堪萨斯州的轨道里程大致相等。BNSF占一级铁路里程的44%,UP占55%。此外,这两条铁路都服务于堪萨斯主要的粮食储存和市场中心。美国农业部2010年的一项研究发现,1988年,蒙大拿州和北达科他州在10个主要粮食生产州中,每吨英里铁路粮食收入最高。到了2007年,情况就不一样了。本文的总体目标是调查北达科他州、堪萨斯州和蒙大拿州小麦运输的铁路定价行为。具体目标包括:(1)开发一个模型来衡量铁路成本和竞争对北达科他州、堪萨斯州和蒙大拿州铁路小麦价格的影响;(2)确定和衡量铁路小麦价格的主要成本决定因素;(3)通过比较垄断市场(蒙大拿州和北达科他州)和多式联运竞争更激烈的市场(堪萨斯州)的铁路小麦价格来衡量多式联运竞争。结果表明,蒙大拿州和堪萨斯州铁路小麦每吨英里的平均运费几乎没有差别。然而,北达科他州铁路小麦每吨英里的平均价格高于堪萨斯州每吨英里的平均价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信