Personalizing Reminders to Personality for Melanoma Self-checking

K. Smith, Matt Dennis, J. Masthoff
{"title":"Personalizing Reminders to Personality for Melanoma Self-checking","authors":"K. Smith, Matt Dennis, J. Masthoff","doi":"10.1145/2930238.2930254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates whether different types of persuasive reminder should be sent to patients with different personalities. We describe a study where we presented participants with a personality measure, then describe a scenario with a fictional patient, who has not performed a skin check for recurrent melanoma. We asked patients to imagine they are in that situation and rate validated reminders based on Cialdini's 6 principles of persuasion for their suitability. Participants then chose their favourite reminder, and an alternative reminder to send if that one failed. We found that persuasive reminders that use `Authority' and 'Liking' are the most popular overall. We also found that personality had an effect when deciding on the type of persuasive reminder to use. In particular, we have found that those with high emotional stability are more responsive to any kind of persuasion, those with low agreeableness rated all types of reminder higher than those with high, and that conscientiousness matters when selecting an alternative reminder.","PeriodicalId":339100,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2930238.2930254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

This paper investigates whether different types of persuasive reminder should be sent to patients with different personalities. We describe a study where we presented participants with a personality measure, then describe a scenario with a fictional patient, who has not performed a skin check for recurrent melanoma. We asked patients to imagine they are in that situation and rate validated reminders based on Cialdini's 6 principles of persuasion for their suitability. Participants then chose their favourite reminder, and an alternative reminder to send if that one failed. We found that persuasive reminders that use `Authority' and 'Liking' are the most popular overall. We also found that personality had an effect when deciding on the type of persuasive reminder to use. In particular, we have found that those with high emotional stability are more responsive to any kind of persuasion, those with low agreeableness rated all types of reminder higher than those with high, and that conscientiousness matters when selecting an alternative reminder.
黑色素瘤自我检查的个性个性化提醒
本文探讨了针对不同性格的患者是否应该发送不同类型的劝导提醒。我们描述了一项研究,我们向参与者提供了一个性格测试,然后描述了一个虚构的病人的场景,这个病人没有做过复发性黑色素瘤的皮肤检查。我们要求患者想象他们处于那种情况,并根据Cialdini的6条说服原则对有效的提醒进行评级。然后,参与者选择他们最喜欢的提醒,如果那个提醒失败了,他们会发送另一个提醒。我们发现,使用“权威”和“喜欢”的说服性提醒是最受欢迎的。我们还发现,在决定使用哪种有说服力的提醒时,性格也有影响。特别是,我们发现那些情绪稳定度高的人对任何说服都更有反应,那些随和度低的人对所有类型的提醒的评价都高于随和度高的人,在选择另一种提醒时,责任心很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信