The Future of Globalization

Roy C. Smith
{"title":"The Future of Globalization","authors":"Roy C. Smith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3374462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2016 populism at the polls has begun to threaten the longstanding western commitment to globalization, i.e., free markets and open societies as the best model for promoting world peace and prosperity. Nationalist now challenges this model in the US, the UK, and several other European countries. The challenges reflect discontent with the last years of economic underachievement, fears of immigration and terrorism in Europe and on the Mexican border, and a wide spread fear of the \"hollowing out\" of the middle and working classes due to unfair Chinese exports. <br><br>But the concerns are greater than they need to be. Things are turning around, and recovery has set in. Globalization is thought to be the most effect way, over time, to generate global peace and prosperity, and to generate economy opportunity through competition. It is well supported by a deep infrastructure of supporting institutions in the governmental, commercial and financial sectors. <br><br>But populism has set in and has attracted a lot of voter interest in shaking things up. Itr is essentially a challenge to the \"elites\" and therefore we will have tp wait for the political process to to return to the center, but globalization will survive in the end.","PeriodicalId":288317,"journal":{"name":"International Political Economy: Globalization eJournal","volume":"63 21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Economy: Globalization eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3374462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2016 populism at the polls has begun to threaten the longstanding western commitment to globalization, i.e., free markets and open societies as the best model for promoting world peace and prosperity. Nationalist now challenges this model in the US, the UK, and several other European countries. The challenges reflect discontent with the last years of economic underachievement, fears of immigration and terrorism in Europe and on the Mexican border, and a wide spread fear of the "hollowing out" of the middle and working classes due to unfair Chinese exports.

But the concerns are greater than they need to be. Things are turning around, and recovery has set in. Globalization is thought to be the most effect way, over time, to generate global peace and prosperity, and to generate economy opportunity through competition. It is well supported by a deep infrastructure of supporting institutions in the governmental, commercial and financial sectors.

But populism has set in and has attracted a lot of voter interest in shaking things up. Itr is essentially a challenge to the "elites" and therefore we will have tp wait for the political process to to return to the center, but globalization will survive in the end.
全球化的未来
自2016年以来,民意调查中的民粹主义开始威胁西方对全球化的长期承诺,即自由市场和开放社会是促进世界和平与繁荣的最佳模式。民族主义者现在在美国、英国和其他几个欧洲国家挑战这种模式。这些挑战反映了对过去几年经济表现不佳的不满,对欧洲和墨西哥边境的移民和恐怖主义的担忧,以及对中国不公平出口导致中产阶级和工人阶级“空心化”的普遍担忧。但人们的担忧超出了必要的程度。情况正在好转,复苏已经开始。全球化被认为是最有效的方式,随着时间的推移,创造全球和平与繁荣,并通过竞争创造经济机会。它得到了政府、商业和金融部门支持机构的深厚基础设施的良好支持。但民粹主义已经出现,并吸引了很多选民对改革的兴趣。它本质上是对“精英”的挑战,因此我们将不得不等待政治进程回到中心,但全球化最终会生存下来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信