P24 Efficacy of age adjusted d dimers in excluding pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer

A. Zahid, R. Khan, A. Baloch, S. Shahzad, M. Ganaie
{"title":"P24 Efficacy of age adjusted d dimers in excluding pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer","authors":"A. Zahid, R. Khan, A. Baloch, S. Shahzad, M. Ganaie","doi":"10.1136/THORAX-2020-BTSABSTRACTS.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Cancer is a strong provoking factor for pulmonary embolism (PE). D-dimer levels are frequently elevated in cancer patients and its specificity decrease with age, hence resulting in frequent unwarranted CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA). There is growing evidence on the utility of age adjusted d-dimer (AADD) in patients >50 years of age. The objective of this study is to test the efficacy of AADD in ruling out PE in cancer patients when compared to conventional d-dimer cut-off. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing CTPA within 48 hours of admission at our institution from 01/04/18 – 30/09/18. Patients Results 807 CTPAs were performed over the 6-month period. 247 patients with cancer were included in further analysis of which 69 (28%) had PE. 60/178 patients (33%) with negative CTPAs had d-dimers positive and AADD negative, whilst only 3/63 CTPAs had positive d-dimers with negative AADD. In essence, 60 patients could have avoided an unnecessary CTPA by using AADD in place of conventional d-dimer, at the expense of missing 3 sub-segmental PE. Conclusion AADD has comparable performance in cancer patients and improves the specificity while retaining sensitivity of d-dimer. It can prevent significant number of inappropriate CTPAs but can potentially miss a few sub-segmental PEs. Further studies are needed to validate its utility before its universal application. Reference Wilts, et al.Thrombosis Research 2017 Apr;152:49–51","PeriodicalId":191322,"journal":{"name":"Lung cancer: treatment options and care pathways","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung cancer: treatment options and care pathways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/THORAX-2020-BTSABSTRACTS.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Cancer is a strong provoking factor for pulmonary embolism (PE). D-dimer levels are frequently elevated in cancer patients and its specificity decrease with age, hence resulting in frequent unwarranted CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA). There is growing evidence on the utility of age adjusted d-dimer (AADD) in patients >50 years of age. The objective of this study is to test the efficacy of AADD in ruling out PE in cancer patients when compared to conventional d-dimer cut-off. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing CTPA within 48 hours of admission at our institution from 01/04/18 – 30/09/18. Patients Results 807 CTPAs were performed over the 6-month period. 247 patients with cancer were included in further analysis of which 69 (28%) had PE. 60/178 patients (33%) with negative CTPAs had d-dimers positive and AADD negative, whilst only 3/63 CTPAs had positive d-dimers with negative AADD. In essence, 60 patients could have avoided an unnecessary CTPA by using AADD in place of conventional d-dimer, at the expense of missing 3 sub-segmental PE. Conclusion AADD has comparable performance in cancer patients and improves the specificity while retaining sensitivity of d-dimer. It can prevent significant number of inappropriate CTPAs but can potentially miss a few sub-segmental PEs. Further studies are needed to validate its utility before its universal application. Reference Wilts, et al.Thrombosis Research 2017 Apr;152:49–51
P24年龄调整d二聚体排除肿瘤患者肺栓塞的疗效
癌症是肺栓塞(PE)的强烈诱发因素。d -二聚体水平在癌症患者中经常升高,其特异性随着年龄的增长而降低,因此导致频繁出现不合理的CT肺血管造影(CTPA)。越来越多的证据表明年龄调节d-二聚体(AADD)在50岁至50岁患者中的应用。本研究的目的是测试与传统的d-二聚体切断相比,AADD在排除癌症患者PE方面的疗效。方法回顾性分析我院自2018年4月1日至2018年9月30日入院48小时内连续行CTPA的患者。患者结果在6个月的时间内共进行了807例ctpa。247例癌症患者纳入进一步分析,其中69例(28%)有PE。60/178 (33%) CTPAs阴性患者d-二聚体阳性,AADD阴性,而只有3/63 CTPAs阳性d-二聚体,AADD阴性。本质上,60例患者可以通过使用AADD代替传统的d-二聚体来避免不必要的CTPA,代价是失去3个亚节段PE。结论AADD在肿瘤患者中具有相当的疗效,在保留d-二聚体敏感性的同时提高了特异性。它可以防止大量不适当的ctpa,但可能会错过一些分节pe。在其普遍应用之前,需要进一步的研究来验证其效用。【参考文献】王晓明,王晓明,等
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信