Retrospective Study on Patients Undergoing Laparotomy to Assess the Risk Factors of Re-Laparotomy

Dr. J. Vaishnavi
{"title":"Retrospective Study on Patients Undergoing Laparotomy to Assess the Risk Factors of Re-Laparotomy","authors":"Dr. J. Vaishnavi","doi":"10.21088/NIJS.0976.4747.11220.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: \nA large number of patients undergo various operative procedures every day, out of which laparotomy forms a major proportion. Abdominal surgery that has to be redone in association with initial surgery is referred to as re laparotomy. Relaparotomy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore it’s the final choice of surgery. Whenever re laparotomy is necessary, mortality \nincreases to as high as 22% to 51%.3. \nAIM OF THE STUDY: \n1. To find out the incidence of re- laparotomy. \n2. To identify the risk factors/ predictors of re laparotomy in patients undergoing general surgery operations. \nOBJECTIVES: \n1. The objective of the study are to find the incidence of revision among laparotomy cases. \n2. To identify the predictors of re laparotomy. \n3. To develop a scoring system to assess patients at risk for re laparotomy. \nMETHODOLOGY: \nStudy Design: Retrospective Study. \nSample size: 100. \nDuration: 1 ½ Year, 1st Jan 2016 – 1st June 2017. \nStatistical Analysis: \n1. Data analysed using SPSS 22. \n2. Results were expressed in percentage. \n3. Associations were analysed using chi-square or ‘t’ test depending on outcome variables. \nInclusion Criteria: \n1. Age more than 18 years. \n2. Patients requiring laparotomy. \n3. Both general and trauma surgery. \nExclusion Criteria: \n1. Patient with initial laparostomy, only flank drain placement. \n2. Laparotomies during colostomy / ileostomy closure. \n3. Initial laparoscopic procedure. \n4. Minimal invasive procedure like ultrasound guided drainage etc. \nRESULTS: \nThe incidence of revision laparotomy in this study was 7% and the incidence of second revision laparotomy was 1%,The indications for relaparotomy wereanastamoticleak 2/7 (20 %) , burst abdomen 2/7 (20%) , pancreatic injury 1/7 (10%), bladder injury 1/7 (10%), negative laparotomy 1/7 (10%), anastamotic leak and burst abdomen , The variables with significant p value are systemic hypertension, COPD, CAD, intra op and post op inotoropic support, wound \ninfection , wound dehiscence and inta abdominal abscess.","PeriodicalId":232888,"journal":{"name":"New Indian Journal of Surgery","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Indian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21088/NIJS.0976.4747.11220.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A large number of patients undergo various operative procedures every day, out of which laparotomy forms a major proportion. Abdominal surgery that has to be redone in association with initial surgery is referred to as re laparotomy. Relaparotomy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore it’s the final choice of surgery. Whenever re laparotomy is necessary, mortality increases to as high as 22% to 51%.3. AIM OF THE STUDY: 1. To find out the incidence of re- laparotomy. 2. To identify the risk factors/ predictors of re laparotomy in patients undergoing general surgery operations. OBJECTIVES: 1. The objective of the study are to find the incidence of revision among laparotomy cases. 2. To identify the predictors of re laparotomy. 3. To develop a scoring system to assess patients at risk for re laparotomy. METHODOLOGY: Study Design: Retrospective Study. Sample size: 100. Duration: 1 ½ Year, 1st Jan 2016 – 1st June 2017. Statistical Analysis: 1. Data analysed using SPSS 22. 2. Results were expressed in percentage. 3. Associations were analysed using chi-square or ‘t’ test depending on outcome variables. Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age more than 18 years. 2. Patients requiring laparotomy. 3. Both general and trauma surgery. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient with initial laparostomy, only flank drain placement. 2. Laparotomies during colostomy / ileostomy closure. 3. Initial laparoscopic procedure. 4. Minimal invasive procedure like ultrasound guided drainage etc. RESULTS: The incidence of revision laparotomy in this study was 7% and the incidence of second revision laparotomy was 1%,The indications for relaparotomy wereanastamoticleak 2/7 (20 %) , burst abdomen 2/7 (20%) , pancreatic injury 1/7 (10%), bladder injury 1/7 (10%), negative laparotomy 1/7 (10%), anastamotic leak and burst abdomen , The variables with significant p value are systemic hypertension, COPD, CAD, intra op and post op inotoropic support, wound infection , wound dehiscence and inta abdominal abscess.
剖腹手术患者再次剖腹手术危险因素的回顾性研究
导读:每天都有大量的患者接受各种手术,其中剖腹手术占很大比例。在初次手术的同时必须重新进行的腹部手术被称为剖腹手术。开腹手术与发病率和死亡率增加有关。因此这是手术的最后选择。当再次剖腹手术是必要的,死亡率增加到高达22%至51%。研究目的:目的了解再次剖腹手术的发生率。2. 目的:探讨普通外科手术患者再次剖腹手术的危险因素/预测因素。目的:1。本研究的目的是发现剖腹手术病例中翻修的发生率。2. 目的:探讨再次剖腹手术的预测因素。3.建立一个评分系统来评估患者再次剖腹手术的风险。方法:研究设计:回顾性研究。样本量:100。持续时间:1年半,2016年1月1日至2017年6月1日。统计分析:数据分析使用SPSS 22。2. 结果以百分比表示。3.根据结果变量,使用卡方检验或t检验分析相关性。纳入标准:1;年龄18岁以上。2. 需要剖腹手术的患者。3.包括普通外科和创伤外科。排除标准:1;病人初次剖腹造口,只放置腹侧引流管。2. 结肠造口/回肠造口闭合期间剖腹手术。3.最初的腹腔镜手术。4. 微创手术如超声引导引流等。结果:本研究翻修剖腹发生率为7%,第二次翻修剖腹发生率为1%,再开腹指征为吻合口漏2/7(20%),腹裂2/7(20%),胰腺损伤1/7(10%),膀胱损伤1/7(10%),阴性剖腹1/7(10%),吻合口漏和腹裂,p值显著的变量为全身性高血压,COPD, CAD,术中术后肌力支持,伤口感染,伤口裂开,腹腔内脓肿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信