Reduced plasma homocysteine levels in elderly Australians following mandatory folic acid fortification – A comparison of two cross-sectional cohorts

Emma Louise Beckett , Charlotte Martin , Lyndell Boyd , Teagan Porter , Katrina King , Suzanne Niblett , Zoe Yates , Martin Veysey , Mark Lucock
{"title":"Reduced plasma homocysteine levels in elderly Australians following mandatory folic acid fortification – A comparison of two cross-sectional cohorts","authors":"Emma Louise Beckett ,&nbsp;Charlotte Martin ,&nbsp;Lyndell Boyd ,&nbsp;Teagan Porter ,&nbsp;Katrina King ,&nbsp;Suzanne Niblett ,&nbsp;Zoe Yates ,&nbsp;Martin Veysey ,&nbsp;Mark Lucock","doi":"10.1016/j.jnim.2017.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In 2009, Australia implemented mandatory folic acid fortification in wheat flour for bread-making. The primary aim was to improve folate status in reproductive-aged women to reduce neural tube defect incidence. However, folic acid consumption has consequently increased in all demographics. Blood folate is inversely associated with homocysteine levels, a risk factor for multiple diseases. Therefore, we assessed the impact of mandatory folic acid fortification on homocysteine levels in elderly Australians.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Homocysteine and blood folate levels were compared between two elderly cross-sectional cohorts (pre-versus post-mandatory folic acid fortification). Importantly, dietary habits were assessed to evaluate the confounding influence of altered dietary patterns not related to fortification.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Post-fortification, plasma homocysteine levels (10.6 vs. 14.5 μmol/L) and hyperhomocysteinemia incidence (27.2% vs 56.3%) were significantly reduced, relative to the pre-fortification subjects. This was associated with increased blood folate (red cell: 1243 vs 1066 nmol/L, serum 28.0 vs 23.9 nmol/L), and increased intake of synthetic folic acid (366.8 vs 231.0 DFE/day) but not natural folate (332.7 vs 323.6 DFE/day). Limited other differences were detected in dietary intake patterns between groups. The positive relationship between homocysteine levels and age was abrogated post-fortification <em>(p</em> = <em>0.3 vs p</em> = <em>0.0003)</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A potential off-target benefit of mandatory folic acid fortification in Australia was demonstrated. With many countries still considering the merits and consequences of mandatory fortification policies, it is important to unravel the off-target effects including dietary context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nutrition & intermediary metabolism","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jnim.2017.04.001","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nutrition & intermediary metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352385917300038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Objective

In 2009, Australia implemented mandatory folic acid fortification in wheat flour for bread-making. The primary aim was to improve folate status in reproductive-aged women to reduce neural tube defect incidence. However, folic acid consumption has consequently increased in all demographics. Blood folate is inversely associated with homocysteine levels, a risk factor for multiple diseases. Therefore, we assessed the impact of mandatory folic acid fortification on homocysteine levels in elderly Australians.

Methods

Homocysteine and blood folate levels were compared between two elderly cross-sectional cohorts (pre-versus post-mandatory folic acid fortification). Importantly, dietary habits were assessed to evaluate the confounding influence of altered dietary patterns not related to fortification.

Results

Post-fortification, plasma homocysteine levels (10.6 vs. 14.5 μmol/L) and hyperhomocysteinemia incidence (27.2% vs 56.3%) were significantly reduced, relative to the pre-fortification subjects. This was associated with increased blood folate (red cell: 1243 vs 1066 nmol/L, serum 28.0 vs 23.9 nmol/L), and increased intake of synthetic folic acid (366.8 vs 231.0 DFE/day) but not natural folate (332.7 vs 323.6 DFE/day). Limited other differences were detected in dietary intake patterns between groups. The positive relationship between homocysteine levels and age was abrogated post-fortification (p = 0.3 vs p = 0.0003).

Conclusions

A potential off-target benefit of mandatory folic acid fortification in Australia was demonstrated. With many countries still considering the merits and consequences of mandatory fortification policies, it is important to unravel the off-target effects including dietary context.

强制性叶酸强化后澳大利亚老年人血浆同型半胱氨酸水平降低-两个横断面队列的比较
目的2009年,澳大利亚在面包用小麦粉中强制添加叶酸。主要目的是改善育龄妇女叶酸状况,以减少神经管缺损的发生率。然而,叶酸的摄入量因此在所有人口统计中都有所增加。血叶酸与同型半胱氨酸水平呈负相关,同型半胱氨酸水平是多种疾病的危险因素。因此,我们评估了强制性叶酸强化对澳大利亚老年人同型半胱氨酸水平的影响。方法比较两组老年人横断面队列(强制叶酸强化前和强制叶酸强化后)的同型半胱氨酸和血叶酸水平。重要的是,对饮食习惯进行了评估,以评估与强化无关的饮食模式改变的混杂影响。结果强化后血浆同型半胱氨酸水平(10.6 μmol/L vs 14.5 μmol/L)和高同型半胱氨酸血症发生率(27.2% vs 56.3%)较强化前显著降低。这与血叶酸增加(红细胞:1243对1066 nmol/L,血清28.0对23.9 nmol/L)和合成叶酸摄入量增加(366.8对231.0 DFE/天)有关,但与天然叶酸摄入量增加(332.7对323.6 DFE/天)无关。在两组之间的饮食摄入模式中发现了有限的其他差异。强化后,同型半胱氨酸水平与年龄之间的正相关关系被取消(p = 0.3 vs p = 0.0003)。结论在澳大利亚,强制性叶酸强化具有潜在的脱靶效应。由于许多国家仍在考虑强制性强化政策的优点和后果,阐明包括饮食背景在内的脱靶效应是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信