Early Hawthorne Forgotten

F. Newberry
{"title":"Early Hawthorne Forgotten","authors":"F. Newberry","doi":"10.5325/nathhawtrevi.42.2.0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We think we know him. As Hyatt Waggoner memorably put it, he's \"our Hawthorne.\" But do we really know him? Or his work? I think our presumed familiarity outstrips our knowledge. Perhaps we cling to an image of the Hawthorne that needs occasional revision. For several decades and increasingly in the 1990s, he was a favorite whipping boy of Americanist criticism. Biographical exposes, only faintly disguised through the legerdermain of psychoanalysis, feminist studies, and racial politics, interpreted a repeated number of Hawthorne's works not so much to illuminate the writings but the man who composed them. And so we have Hawthorne the man who lacks confidence in himself as a writer; Hawthorne who doubts his manhood; Hawthorne who harbors unacknowledged homoerotic desires; Hawthorne who reveals a lifelong attraction to and repulsion from homosexual experience initiated by a Manning uncle; Hawthorne who has an erotic fascination for Herman Melville or Maragret Fuller; and Hawthorne who, in addition to feeling dubious about the efficacy of civic reform movements generally, was a racist. Whether or not we affirm any of these views, the only \"our Hawthorne\" that we might agree upon is that he was a fairly dark, brooding sort of fellow, that he was rather shy or private, not given to conviviality, that he was obsessed with matters of guilt and quite severe in his moral judgments, that he inherited his gloom and solitariness and severity from the Puritan tradition of New England, and that, partly owing to all of these traits and influences, he really didn't have much regard for what he frequently termed his \"idle\" stories. Some evidence supports this composite image, particularly if we restrict the focus to the fiction upon which commentators have largely devoted their attention. For the most part, unrelieved darkness and pessimism seem to dominate virtually all of the seventeenth- and eighteenth-century historical tales, as well as The Scarlet Letter and The Marble Faun, and considerably The House of the Seven Gables and The Blithedale Romance. Shy, hesitant, or self-doubting male characters appear often enough as in Tobias Pearson in \"The Gentle Boy\" and the title character in \"Young Goodman Brown,\" or, more famously, in Dimmesdale in The Scarlet Letter. Isolation or estrangement takes center stage in \"The Man of Adamant,\" \"Wakefield,\" \"Ethan Brand,\" and The Blithedale Romance. Guilt predominates in \"Roger Malvin's Burial,\" The Scarlet Letter, Seven Gables, and The Marble Faun. Seemingly weak artist figures or nervous male characters acquire prominence in \"The Artist of the Beautiful,\" The Scarlet Letter, and The Blithedale Romance. Accordingly, Hawthorne would not appear to have been a very happy guy. Yet we tend to forget, even those of us who read him whole, that Hawthorne wrote a lot of tales and sketches, by my count just over one hundred. Of these, only 18 can be considered more or less historical. Of the remaining 80 or so, only a few have normally been anthologized, such as \"Wakefield,\" \"Rappaccini's Daughter,\" and \"Ethan Brand.\" As a result, roughly 75 works are generally unfamiliar to most readers, and I would guess that at least half of these cannot be recalled by title, let alone content, even by scholars who devote much of their professional attention to Hawthorne. For example, the following titles rarely ring a bell--\"A Bell's Biography\"--\"My Visit to Niagara\"--\"The Village Uncle\"--\"Graves and Goblins\"--\"A Visit to the Clerk of the Weather\"--\"David Swan\"--\"Edward Fane's Rosebud\"--\"Peter Goldthwaite's Treasure\"--\"Chippings with a Chisel\"--\"Foot-prints on the Sea-shore\"--\"Snow-flakes\"--\"The Lily's Quest\"--\"An Antique Ring\"--\"The Old Apple-Dealer.\" Taken together, these obscure tales and sketches present a Hawthorne more diverse in temperament and authorial enterprise than we can easily perceive in the stories and the novels commonly reprinted. To be sure, some of these non-canonical works reflect the infamously known Hawthorne, but many reflect a jovial, jesting, and even child-like but certainly optimistic side of his temperament, quite unlike what we have been nudged to expect from criticism. …","PeriodicalId":261601,"journal":{"name":"Nathaniel Hawthorne Review","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nathaniel Hawthorne Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/nathhawtrevi.42.2.0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We think we know him. As Hyatt Waggoner memorably put it, he's "our Hawthorne." But do we really know him? Or his work? I think our presumed familiarity outstrips our knowledge. Perhaps we cling to an image of the Hawthorne that needs occasional revision. For several decades and increasingly in the 1990s, he was a favorite whipping boy of Americanist criticism. Biographical exposes, only faintly disguised through the legerdermain of psychoanalysis, feminist studies, and racial politics, interpreted a repeated number of Hawthorne's works not so much to illuminate the writings but the man who composed them. And so we have Hawthorne the man who lacks confidence in himself as a writer; Hawthorne who doubts his manhood; Hawthorne who harbors unacknowledged homoerotic desires; Hawthorne who reveals a lifelong attraction to and repulsion from homosexual experience initiated by a Manning uncle; Hawthorne who has an erotic fascination for Herman Melville or Maragret Fuller; and Hawthorne who, in addition to feeling dubious about the efficacy of civic reform movements generally, was a racist. Whether or not we affirm any of these views, the only "our Hawthorne" that we might agree upon is that he was a fairly dark, brooding sort of fellow, that he was rather shy or private, not given to conviviality, that he was obsessed with matters of guilt and quite severe in his moral judgments, that he inherited his gloom and solitariness and severity from the Puritan tradition of New England, and that, partly owing to all of these traits and influences, he really didn't have much regard for what he frequently termed his "idle" stories. Some evidence supports this composite image, particularly if we restrict the focus to the fiction upon which commentators have largely devoted their attention. For the most part, unrelieved darkness and pessimism seem to dominate virtually all of the seventeenth- and eighteenth-century historical tales, as well as The Scarlet Letter and The Marble Faun, and considerably The House of the Seven Gables and The Blithedale Romance. Shy, hesitant, or self-doubting male characters appear often enough as in Tobias Pearson in "The Gentle Boy" and the title character in "Young Goodman Brown," or, more famously, in Dimmesdale in The Scarlet Letter. Isolation or estrangement takes center stage in "The Man of Adamant," "Wakefield," "Ethan Brand," and The Blithedale Romance. Guilt predominates in "Roger Malvin's Burial," The Scarlet Letter, Seven Gables, and The Marble Faun. Seemingly weak artist figures or nervous male characters acquire prominence in "The Artist of the Beautiful," The Scarlet Letter, and The Blithedale Romance. Accordingly, Hawthorne would not appear to have been a very happy guy. Yet we tend to forget, even those of us who read him whole, that Hawthorne wrote a lot of tales and sketches, by my count just over one hundred. Of these, only 18 can be considered more or less historical. Of the remaining 80 or so, only a few have normally been anthologized, such as "Wakefield," "Rappaccini's Daughter," and "Ethan Brand." As a result, roughly 75 works are generally unfamiliar to most readers, and I would guess that at least half of these cannot be recalled by title, let alone content, even by scholars who devote much of their professional attention to Hawthorne. For example, the following titles rarely ring a bell--"A Bell's Biography"--"My Visit to Niagara"--"The Village Uncle"--"Graves and Goblins"--"A Visit to the Clerk of the Weather"--"David Swan"--"Edward Fane's Rosebud"--"Peter Goldthwaite's Treasure"--"Chippings with a Chisel"--"Foot-prints on the Sea-shore"--"Snow-flakes"--"The Lily's Quest"--"An Antique Ring"--"The Old Apple-Dealer." Taken together, these obscure tales and sketches present a Hawthorne more diverse in temperament and authorial enterprise than we can easily perceive in the stories and the novels commonly reprinted. To be sure, some of these non-canonical works reflect the infamously known Hawthorne, but many reflect a jovial, jesting, and even child-like but certainly optimistic side of his temperament, quite unlike what we have been nudged to expect from criticism. …
被遗忘的早期霍桑
我们想我们认识他。正如凯悦·瓦格纳所言,他是“我们的霍桑”。但我们真的了解他吗?还是他的作品?我认为我们的熟悉程度超过了我们的知识。也许我们对霍桑的印象需要偶尔的修正。几十年来,尤其是在20世纪90年代,他一直是美国批评家最喜欢的替罪羊。通过精神分析、女权主义研究和种族政治的把戏,传记性的揭露只是隐隐约约地掩饰了一下,对霍桑大量作品的解读,与其说是为了阐明作品本身,不如说是为了阐明创作这些作品的人。所以我们看到了霍桑这个对自己作为作家缺乏信心的人;怀疑自己成年的霍桑;霍桑怀有未被承认的同性恋欲望;霍桑揭示了他一生对同性恋经历的吸引和排斥是由曼宁的一个叔叔发起的;霍桑对赫尔曼·梅尔维尔和玛格丽特·富勒都有情爱迷恋;霍桑除了怀疑公民改革运动的有效性之外,他还是一个种族主义者。我们是否确认这些观点,唯一的“霍桑”,我们可能达成一致的是,他是一个相当黑暗,忧郁的家伙,他很害羞或私人,没有欢乐,他痴迷于内疚和相当严重的问题在他的道德判断,他继承了他的忧郁和孤独来自新英格兰的清教徒传统和严重程度,而且,部分由于这些特征和影响,对于那些他经常称之为“无聊”的故事,他真的不太在意。一些证据支持这一综合形象,特别是如果我们将焦点限制在评论家们主要关注的小说上。在大多数情况下,难以释然的黑暗和悲观似乎主导了几乎所有17和18世纪的历史故事,以及《红字》和《大理石农牧之神》,以及相当多的《七山墙屋》和《欢乐谷传奇》。害羞、犹豫或自我怀疑的男性角色经常出现,比如《温柔的男孩》中的托拜厄斯·皮尔森和《年轻的古德曼·布朗》中的主角,或者更著名的《红字》中的丁梅斯代尔。在《铁石汉子》、《韦克菲尔德》、《伊桑·布兰德》和《Blithedale Romance》中,孤立或隔阂占据了中心舞台。罪恶感在《罗杰·马尔文的葬礼》、《红字》、《七座山墙》和《大理石羊怪》中占主导地位。在《美丽的艺术家》、《红字》和《布利斯代尔罗曼史》中,看似软弱的艺术家人物或紧张的男性角色获得了突出的地位。因此,霍桑似乎不是个很快乐的人。然而,我们往往会忘记,即使是那些读过他全部作品的人,霍桑也写了很多故事和小品,据我统计,只有一百多部。其中,只有18个可以被认为或多或少具有历史意义。在剩下的大约80部作品中,只有少数几部通常被编成了选集,比如《韦克菲尔德》、《拉帕奇尼的女儿》和《伊桑·布兰德》。结果,大约有75部作品对大多数读者来说是不熟悉的,我猜其中至少有一半连标题都记不起来,更不用说内容了,即使是那些把大部分专业注意力放在霍桑身上的学者。例如,下面的标题很少让人想起——《一个贝尔的传记》——《我的尼亚加拉之旅》——《村里的叔叔》——《坟墓和半妖》——《拜访气象员》——《大卫·斯万》——《爱德华·费恩的玫瑰花苞》——《彼得·戈德斯韦特的宝藏》——《用凿子凿的碎片》——《海边的脚印》——《雪花》——《百合的追寻》——《一个古董戒指》——《老苹果商》。总的来说,这些晦涩的故事和小品展现了霍桑在气质和创作上的多样化,而不是我们在通常转载的故事和小说中轻易感受到的。可以肯定的是,这些非经典作品中有一些反映了臭名昭著的霍桑,但也有许多反映了他性格中快乐、开玩笑、甚至像孩子一样乐观的一面,这与我们所期望的批评完全不同。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信