A hybrid approach for multi-criteria decision problems

Karima Sedki, V. Delcroix
{"title":"A hybrid approach for multi-criteria decision problems","authors":"Karima Sedki, V. Delcroix","doi":"10.1109/NAFIPS.2010.5548201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are several situations where humans express their preferences in order to take good decisions. The major problem is that humans' preferences are more and more complex, the multiple criteria considered are often conflicting and the number of alternatives is too large to be explicitly handled. The objective of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approaches is to efficiently model and solve such complex decision problems. In this paper, we propose a framework allowing on one hand to encode users' preferences about the alternatives regarding the available criteria using a logic-based approach which is a variant of the Qualitative Choice Logic (QCL). On the other hand, the importance of each criterion is considered and computed in terms of probability degrees with respect to what is already known about the person who takes the decision. The available alternatives are then evaluated following two aspects: the first one concerns verifying if a given alternative is satisfied in the preferred models of the users' preferences while the second one is related to the criterion's importance.","PeriodicalId":394892,"journal":{"name":"2010 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.2010.5548201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

There are several situations where humans express their preferences in order to take good decisions. The major problem is that humans' preferences are more and more complex, the multiple criteria considered are often conflicting and the number of alternatives is too large to be explicitly handled. The objective of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approaches is to efficiently model and solve such complex decision problems. In this paper, we propose a framework allowing on one hand to encode users' preferences about the alternatives regarding the available criteria using a logic-based approach which is a variant of the Qualitative Choice Logic (QCL). On the other hand, the importance of each criterion is considered and computed in terms of probability degrees with respect to what is already known about the person who takes the decision. The available alternatives are then evaluated following two aspects: the first one concerns verifying if a given alternative is satisfied in the preferred models of the users' preferences while the second one is related to the criterion's importance.
多准则决策问题的混合方法
在一些情况下,人类会为了做出正确的决定而表达自己的偏好。主要的问题是,人类的偏好越来越复杂,考虑的多个标准往往相互冲突,备选方案的数量太大,无法明确处理。多准则决策(MCDM)方法的目标就是有效地建模和解决这类复杂的决策问题。在本文中,我们提出了一个框架,一方面允许使用基于逻辑的方法(定性选择逻辑(QCL)的变体)对用户关于可用标准的备选方案的偏好进行编码。另一方面,考虑和计算每个标准的重要性的概率度相对于已经知道的人做决定。然后对可用的备选方案进行以下两个方面的评估:第一个方面涉及验证给定的备选方案是否满足用户偏好的首选模型,而第二个方面与标准的重要性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信