Preliminary study: Qualitative indicators in multi-objective DIRECT framework

C. Wong, S. Sundaram
{"title":"Preliminary study: Qualitative indicators in multi-objective DIRECT framework","authors":"C. Wong, S. Sundaram","doi":"10.1109/SSCI.2016.7850233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DIRECT is known for balancing the exploration and exploitation of a search space. This paper seeks to explore the improvement of diversity among solutions through the use of qualitative indicators in multi-objective DIRECT framework. Three different indicators - Hypervolume (HV), Epsilon (EPS), R2 indicators are used in this study. The three variants of indicators are tested on the Black-box Multi-objective Optimization Benchmarking (BMOB) Platform. The results are presented and some insights in the choice of selection operator are provided. Overall, HV indicator performs the best followed by R2, then EPS. EPS indicator performs worse than HV and R2 in unimodal problems. Also, HV indicator achieves notably better results at high dimensions. R2 performs better than EPS in non-separable problems.","PeriodicalId":120288,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2016.7850233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

DIRECT is known for balancing the exploration and exploitation of a search space. This paper seeks to explore the improvement of diversity among solutions through the use of qualitative indicators in multi-objective DIRECT framework. Three different indicators - Hypervolume (HV), Epsilon (EPS), R2 indicators are used in this study. The three variants of indicators are tested on the Black-box Multi-objective Optimization Benchmarking (BMOB) Platform. The results are presented and some insights in the choice of selection operator are provided. Overall, HV indicator performs the best followed by R2, then EPS. EPS indicator performs worse than HV and R2 in unimodal problems. Also, HV indicator achieves notably better results at high dimensions. R2 performs better than EPS in non-separable problems.
初步研究:多目标DIRECT框架中的定性指标
DIRECT以平衡搜索空间的探索和利用而闻名。本文试图通过在多目标DIRECT框架中使用定性指标来探讨解决方案之间多样性的改善。本研究采用了Hypervolume (HV)、Epsilon (EPS)、R2三种不同的指标。在黑盒多目标优化基准测试平台(BMOB)上对三种指标进行了测试。给出了结果,并对选择算子的选择提供了一些见解。总体而言,HV指标表现最好,其次是R2,其次是EPS。EPS指标在单峰问题中的表现不如HV和R2。此外,HV指标在高维上的效果也明显更好。R2在非可分问题上优于EPS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信