Eğitim Mobilyaları Standardının (TS EN 1729-1) Ergonomik Yaklaşımlara Uygunluğunun Değerlendirilmesi

Karaelmas İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Dergisi Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.33720/kisgd.690806

Koray Develi, S. Sümer

{"title":"Eğitim Mobilyaları Standardının (TS EN 1729-1) Ergonomik Yaklaşımlara Uygunluğunun Değerlendirilmesi","authors":"Koray Develi, S. Sümer","doi":"10.33720/kisgd.690806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, it is aimed to determine the compatibility of the limit values specified in the education furniture standard (TS EN 1729-1) with ergonomic approaches. For this purpose, anthropometric measurement studies were carried out on students of Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Faculty of Agriculture. The anthropometric data and taking into consideration ergonomic approaches put forward by various researchers, the dimensions of ergonomic education furniture were determined and compared with the values specified in the standard. It has been determined that the furniture sizes calculated for students do not exactly match the dimensions specified in the standard and the incompatibility is 61.90%. In addition, the suitability to the relevant standard and ergonomics of educational furniture in the faculty were evaluated. In the evaluation made for educational furniture to the classroom, amphi and drawing hall; ergonomic suitability percentages were calculated as 25%, 12.50% and 37.50%, respectively, and suitability to the standard percentages as 61.53%, 46.15% and 76.92%, respectively. In this case the students as well as the motivation to lessons, neck, back, waist pain and the musculoskeletal system can cause discomfort and EN 1729-1 standards which apply to all educational institutions in European countries, It was not found to meet the identified most of ergonomic values for the anthropometric characteristics of students in higher education institutions in Turkey. Therefore, it was concluded that the furniture to be used in educational institutions should be designed not only to the standard but also taking into account the anthropometric features and ergonomic approaches.","PeriodicalId":143486,"journal":{"name":"Karaelmas İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Dergisi","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karaelmas İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33720/kisgd.690806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to determine the compatibility of the limit values specified in the education furniture standard (TS EN 1729-1) with ergonomic approaches. For this purpose, anthropometric measurement studies were carried out on students of Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Faculty of Agriculture. The anthropometric data and taking into consideration ergonomic approaches put forward by various researchers, the dimensions of ergonomic education furniture were determined and compared with the values specified in the standard. It has been determined that the furniture sizes calculated for students do not exactly match the dimensions specified in the standard and the incompatibility is 61.90%. In addition, the suitability to the relevant standard and ergonomics of educational furniture in the faculty were evaluated. In the evaluation made for educational furniture to the classroom, amphi and drawing hall; ergonomic suitability percentages were calculated as 25%, 12.50% and 37.50%, respectively, and suitability to the standard percentages as 61.53%, 46.15% and 76.92%, respectively. In this case the students as well as the motivation to lessons, neck, back, waist pain and the musculoskeletal system can cause discomfort and EN 1729-1 standards which apply to all educational institutions in European countries, It was not found to meet the identified most of ergonomic values for the anthropometric characteristics of students in higher education institutions in Turkey. Therefore, it was concluded that the furniture to be used in educational institutions should be designed not only to the standard but also taking into account the anthropometric features and ergonomic approaches.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在本研究中，旨在确定教育家具标准(TS EN 1729-1)中规定的限值与人体工程学方法的兼容性。为此，对Canakkale Onsekiz Mart大学农学院的学生进行了人体测量研究。根据人体测量数据，并考虑到不同研究者提出的人体工程学方法，确定了符合人体工程学的教育家具的尺寸，并与标准中规定的数值进行了比较。经确定，为学生计算的家具尺寸与标准中规定的尺寸不完全匹配，不兼容性为61.90%。此外，还评估了教学家具是否符合相关标准和人体工程学。在对教室、教室、画室的教学家具进行评价时;人体工程学适宜性百分比分别为25%、12.50%和37.50%，对标准的适宜性百分比分别为61.53%、46.15%和76.92%。在这种情况下，学生以及上课的动机，颈部，背部，腰部疼痛和肌肉骨骼系统会导致不适和适用于欧洲国家所有教育机构的EN 1729-1标准，它不符合土耳其高等教育机构学生人体测量特征的大多数人体工程学值。因此，结论是，在教育机构中使用的家具不仅要按照标准设计，而且要考虑到人体测量学特征和人体工程学方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Karaelmas İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Dergisi

自引率

0.00%

发文量