Feature Extraction and Feature Selection Methods in Classification of Brain MRI Images: A Review

A. I. Poernama, I. Soesanti, O. Wahyunggoro
{"title":"Feature Extraction and Feature Selection Methods in Classification of Brain MRI Images: A Review","authors":"A. I. Poernama, I. Soesanti, O. Wahyunggoro","doi":"10.1109/IBITeC46597.2019.9091724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or MRI, is one of the safest ways to observe human tissues and organs, like the brain. It causes no radiation and bad effect for the patient. The necessity of early detection of brain tumor leads the researchers to initiate this study. Early detection of a brain tumor can be observed through MRI image results. The brain MRI images are then processed by using 3 major steps, namely image processing, feature extraction and selection, and classification. The feature extraction and selection are one of the important steps that can determine the accuracy of brain MRI images classification in which its result will determine the disease. This paper examines 9 feature extraction and 3 feature selection methods for classification of brain MRI images. Furthermore, it explores the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Both of them are considered in the selection of the best method to be applied in different cases. The summary of each method is presented in a table as supportive evidence. This study shows that Local Binary Pattern combined with GLRL, ZM, PHOG, and GLCM is the best feature extraction method for BRATS dataset with a classification accuracy of 97.1%, while GLDM and GA are the best combinations of feature extraction and selection method for clinical datasets with a classification accuracy of 98%.","PeriodicalId":198107,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Conference (IBITeC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Conference (IBITeC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IBITeC46597.2019.9091724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or MRI, is one of the safest ways to observe human tissues and organs, like the brain. It causes no radiation and bad effect for the patient. The necessity of early detection of brain tumor leads the researchers to initiate this study. Early detection of a brain tumor can be observed through MRI image results. The brain MRI images are then processed by using 3 major steps, namely image processing, feature extraction and selection, and classification. The feature extraction and selection are one of the important steps that can determine the accuracy of brain MRI images classification in which its result will determine the disease. This paper examines 9 feature extraction and 3 feature selection methods for classification of brain MRI images. Furthermore, it explores the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Both of them are considered in the selection of the best method to be applied in different cases. The summary of each method is presented in a table as supportive evidence. This study shows that Local Binary Pattern combined with GLRL, ZM, PHOG, and GLCM is the best feature extraction method for BRATS dataset with a classification accuracy of 97.1%, while GLDM and GA are the best combinations of feature extraction and selection method for clinical datasets with a classification accuracy of 98%.
脑MRI图像分类中的特征提取与特征选择方法综述
磁共振成像(MRI)是观察人体组织和器官(如大脑)最安全的方法之一。无辐射,对患者无不良影响。早期发现脑肿瘤的必要性促使研究人员开展了这项研究。早期发现脑肿瘤可以通过MRI图像结果观察。然后对脑MRI图像进行处理,主要分为图像处理、特征提取与选择、分类3个步骤。特征提取和选择是决定脑MRI图像分类准确性的重要步骤之一,其结果将决定脑MRI图像的疾病类型。研究了脑MRI图像分类的9种特征提取和3种特征选择方法。此外,还探讨了每种方法的优缺点。在选择适用于不同情况的最佳方法时,考虑了这两种方法。每种方法的总结在表格中作为支持性证据。本研究表明,局部二值模式结合GLRL、ZM、PHOG和GLCM是BRATS数据集的最佳特征提取方法,分类准确率为97.1%;GLDM和GA是临床数据集的最佳特征提取与选择结合方法,分类准确率为98%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信