Influence of Landsat Revisit Frequency on Time-Integration of Evapotranspiration for Agricultural Water Management

R. Trezza, R. Allen, A. Kilic, I. Ratcliffe, M. Tasumi
{"title":"Influence of Landsat Revisit Frequency on Time-Integration of Evapotranspiration for Agricultural Water Management","authors":"R. Trezza, R. Allen, A. Kilic, I. Ratcliffe, M. Tasumi","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.80946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to explore the improvement in accuracy of estimates for evapotranspiration (ET) over complete growing seasons and monthly periods, when more frequent Landsat imagery is made available. Conversely, we explored the reduction in accuracy in ET estimates when frequency of Landsat imagery was reduced. The study was implemented by conducting a series of METRIC applications for two Landsat WRS path overlap areas, one in southern Idaho (paths 39 and 40) during 2000, and a second one in Nebraska (paths 29 and 30) during 2002, years when two fully functioning satellites, Landsat 5 and Landsat 7, were in orbit. The results indicated that high frequency imagery provided by two satellites covering a WRS path overlap was more able to capture the impacts of rapid crop development and harvest, and evaporation associated by wetting events. That data set simulated a nominal four-day revisit time. Three-simulated 16-day revisit data sets created using a single Landsat series for a single path were unable to produce monthly and growing season ET due to the lack of sufficient number of images to even begin the time-integration process. This emphasizes the need to maintain two Landsat satellites in orbit and the high value of four-day revisit times. Limiting the data set to one path and two satellites (eight-day revisit) underestimated growing season ET accordingly by about 8% on average. Error in monthly ET was relatively high when image availability was limited to that for an eight-day revisit. This is due to the importance of timing of images to identify key inflection points in the ETrF curves and to capture special events such as wetting events from irrigation and rain or from water stress or cuttings, as in the case of forage crops. Results suggest that a four-day revisit time as represented by the full-run (run 1) of our analysis provides robustness in the development of time-integrated ET estimates over months and growing seasons, and is a valuable backstop for mitigation of clouded images over extended periods.","PeriodicalId":189693,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Evapotranspiration Methods and Applications","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Evapotranspiration Methods and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.80946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore the improvement in accuracy of estimates for evapotranspiration (ET) over complete growing seasons and monthly periods, when more frequent Landsat imagery is made available. Conversely, we explored the reduction in accuracy in ET estimates when frequency of Landsat imagery was reduced. The study was implemented by conducting a series of METRIC applications for two Landsat WRS path overlap areas, one in southern Idaho (paths 39 and 40) during 2000, and a second one in Nebraska (paths 29 and 30) during 2002, years when two fully functioning satellites, Landsat 5 and Landsat 7, were in orbit. The results indicated that high frequency imagery provided by two satellites covering a WRS path overlap was more able to capture the impacts of rapid crop development and harvest, and evaporation associated by wetting events. That data set simulated a nominal four-day revisit time. Three-simulated 16-day revisit data sets created using a single Landsat series for a single path were unable to produce monthly and growing season ET due to the lack of sufficient number of images to even begin the time-integration process. This emphasizes the need to maintain two Landsat satellites in orbit and the high value of four-day revisit times. Limiting the data set to one path and two satellites (eight-day revisit) underestimated growing season ET accordingly by about 8% on average. Error in monthly ET was relatively high when image availability was limited to that for an eight-day revisit. This is due to the importance of timing of images to identify key inflection points in the ETrF curves and to capture special events such as wetting events from irrigation and rain or from water stress or cuttings, as in the case of forage crops. Results suggest that a four-day revisit time as represented by the full-run (run 1) of our analysis provides robustness in the development of time-integrated ET estimates over months and growing seasons, and is a valuable backstop for mitigation of clouded images over extended periods.
陆地卫星重访频率对农业水资源管理蒸散时间积分的影响
本研究的目的是探讨在更频繁的Landsat图像可用时,在整个生长季节和每月期间蒸散发(ET)估算精度的改进。相反,我们探讨了当陆地卫星图像频率降低时,ET估算精度的降低。该研究是通过对两个陆地卫星WRS路径重叠区域进行一系列METRIC应用来实施的,一个是2000年在爱达荷州南部(路径39和40),另一个是2002年在内布拉斯加州(路径29和30),当时两颗功能齐全的卫星Landsat 5和Landsat 7在轨道上运行。结果表明,覆盖WRS路径重叠的两颗卫星提供的高频图像更能捕捉到作物快速生长和收获的影响,以及与湿润事件相关的蒸发。该数据集模拟了名义上四天的重访时间。由于缺乏足够数量的图像,甚至无法开始时间整合过程,因此使用单个Landsat系列为单个路径创建的3个模拟16天重访数据集无法产生月度和生长期ET。这强调需要在轨道上保持两颗陆地卫星,以及四天重访时间的高价值。将数据集限制在一条路径和两颗卫星(8天重访)上,相应地平均低估了生长季节ET约8%。当图像可用性限于8天重访时,每月ET的误差相对较高。这是由于图像时间的重要性,以确定ETrF曲线中的关键拐点,并捕捉特殊事件,如灌溉和降雨或水胁迫或插枝,如饲料作物的润湿事件。结果表明,我们的分析的完整运行(运行1)所代表的四天重访时间为开发数月和生长季节的时间集成ET估算提供了鲁棒性,并且是在较长时间内减轻云雾图像的宝贵支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书