The Theory of Classification, Part 7: A Class is a Type Family

A. Simons
{"title":"The Theory of Classification, Part 7: A Class is a Type Family","authors":"A. Simons","doi":"10.5381/jot.2003.2.3.c2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We shall discover circumstances in which a type system based on subtyping breaks down, providing less than useful information. Object-oriented languages like Smalltalk and Eiffel exhibit sophisticated, systematic kinds of behaviour which cannot adequately be described in terms of types and subtyping. By appealing to natural notions of classification in biology, we shall demonstrate the extent to which the subtyping model fails to capture the intuitive notion of a class. In this article, we shall define the notion of class formally, and prove that it is more than just a type. To understand this, we will need to extend our formal model to include type polymorphism. This requires the second-order λ-calculus and notions of universal [4, 5] and function-bounded quantification [6, 7].","PeriodicalId":383341,"journal":{"name":"J. Object Technol.","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Object Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5381/jot.2003.2.3.c2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

We shall discover circumstances in which a type system based on subtyping breaks down, providing less than useful information. Object-oriented languages like Smalltalk and Eiffel exhibit sophisticated, systematic kinds of behaviour which cannot adequately be described in terms of types and subtyping. By appealing to natural notions of classification in biology, we shall demonstrate the extent to which the subtyping model fails to capture the intuitive notion of a class. In this article, we shall define the notion of class formally, and prove that it is more than just a type. To understand this, we will need to extend our formal model to include type polymorphism. This requires the second-order λ-calculus and notions of universal [4, 5] and function-bounded quantification [6, 7].
分类理论,第七部分:类是类型族
我们将发现基于子类型的类型系统崩溃的情况,提供的信息不够有用。像Smalltalk和Eiffel这样的面向对象语言展示了复杂的、系统的行为,这些行为不能用类型和子类型来充分描述。通过诉诸生物学中分类的自然概念,我们将证明分型模型在多大程度上未能捕捉到类的直观概念。在本文中,我们将正式定义类的概念,并证明它不仅仅是一种类型。为了理解这一点,我们需要扩展我们的形式模型以包含类型多态性。这需要二阶λ微积分和泛域[4,5]和函数有界量化[6,7]的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书