{"title":"Can CoCo-Bonds Mitigate Systemic Risk?","authors":"Arndt-Gerrit Kund, Matthias Petras","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3455924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the 2007 financial crises, the idea of contingent convertible (CoCo) capital was revived and manifold proposed as a means to stabilize individual banks, and hence the entire banking system. The purpose of this paper is to empirically test, whether CoCo-bonds indeed improve the stability of the banking system and reduce systemic risk. Using the broadly applied SRISK metric, we obtain contradicting results, based on the classification of the CoCo-bond as debt or equity. We remedy this short-coming by proposing an adjustment to the original SRISK formula that now correctly accounts for CoCo-bonds. Using empirical tests, we show that the undue disparity has been solved by our adjustment, and that CoCo-bonds reduce systemic risk.","PeriodicalId":123550,"journal":{"name":"Financial Crises eJournal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Crises eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3455924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
After the 2007 financial crises, the idea of contingent convertible (CoCo) capital was revived and manifold proposed as a means to stabilize individual banks, and hence the entire banking system. The purpose of this paper is to empirically test, whether CoCo-bonds indeed improve the stability of the banking system and reduce systemic risk. Using the broadly applied SRISK metric, we obtain contradicting results, based on the classification of the CoCo-bond as debt or equity. We remedy this short-coming by proposing an adjustment to the original SRISK formula that now correctly accounts for CoCo-bonds. Using empirical tests, we show that the undue disparity has been solved by our adjustment, and that CoCo-bonds reduce systemic risk.
在2007年金融危机之后,或有可转换资本(CoCo)的概念被重新提起,并被广泛提出作为稳定个别银行乃至整个银行体系的一种手段。本文的目的是实证检验co - co -bonds是否确实提高了银行体系的稳定性,降低了系统性风险。使用广泛应用的SRISK指标,基于CoCo-bond为债务或股权的分类,我们得到了相互矛盾的结果。为了弥补这一缺陷,我们建议对原来的SRISK公式进行调整,该公式现在正确地计入了CoCo-bonds。通过实证检验,我们发现我们的调整解决了不合理的差异,co - co -bonds降低了系统性风险。