Constitutional Tribunal in an Argument with the President, Government and Parliament of the Polish Republic in 2015

G. Górski, Joanna Górska-Szymczak
{"title":"Constitutional Tribunal in an Argument with the President, Government and Parliament of the Polish Republic in 2015","authors":"G. Górski, Joanna Górska-Szymczak","doi":"10.2478/lape-2019-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The judicial decision of the Constitutional Tribunal from 3rd December 2015 (K/34/15) is the subject of the analysis. In this case the Tribunal considered the matter of the constitutional character of the act on the Constitutional Tribunal from June 2015. The authors focused on the question of justification of the Tribunal opinion regarding the regulations which were the basis for the appointment of five judges of the Constitutional Tribunal by the Sejm of VII term. While discussing the justification of the Tribunal the authors emphasize that the Tribunal justified its opinion, according to which it acknowledged the constitutional basis for the appointment of three individuals and questioned the constitutional character of the same regulations in case of two others, in an entirely superficial manner. The authors present as a significant element of their reasoning the circumstances of adopting by the American Supreme Court in 1803 the adjudication in the Marbury v. Madison case in order to emphasize in this context the weight of rational and thorough argumentation of the grave constitutional matters. Taking the above into account, it is even more clearly visible that in the discussed judicial decision the Constitutional Tribunal limited its reaction to the laconic set of arguments regarding this key matter.","PeriodicalId":244362,"journal":{"name":"Law and Administration in Post-Soviet Europe","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Administration in Post-Soviet Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/lape-2019-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The judicial decision of the Constitutional Tribunal from 3rd December 2015 (K/34/15) is the subject of the analysis. In this case the Tribunal considered the matter of the constitutional character of the act on the Constitutional Tribunal from June 2015. The authors focused on the question of justification of the Tribunal opinion regarding the regulations which were the basis for the appointment of five judges of the Constitutional Tribunal by the Sejm of VII term. While discussing the justification of the Tribunal the authors emphasize that the Tribunal justified its opinion, according to which it acknowledged the constitutional basis for the appointment of three individuals and questioned the constitutional character of the same regulations in case of two others, in an entirely superficial manner. The authors present as a significant element of their reasoning the circumstances of adopting by the American Supreme Court in 1803 the adjudication in the Marbury v. Madison case in order to emphasize in this context the weight of rational and thorough argumentation of the grave constitutional matters. Taking the above into account, it is even more clearly visible that in the discussed judicial decision the Constitutional Tribunal limited its reaction to the laconic set of arguments regarding this key matter.
2015年宪法法庭与波兰共和国总统、政府和议会的争论
本文以2015年12月3日宪法法庭的司法判决(K/34/15)为分析对象。在本案中,法庭审议了2015年6月以来《宪法法庭法》的宪法性质问题。发件人集中讨论了法庭关于条例的意见的正当性问题,这些条例是第七届瑟姆任命宪法法庭五名法官的依据。在讨论法庭的理由时,作者强调,法庭的意见是有理由的,根据该意见,法庭承认任命三名个人的宪法依据,并以完全肤浅的方式质疑同一条例对另外两名个人的宪法性质。作者将1803年美国最高法院对马布里诉麦迪逊案作出裁决的情况作为其论证的一个重要因素,以强调在这种情况下,对严重的宪法问题进行理性和彻底辩论的重要性。考虑到上述情况,更明显的是,在所讨论的司法决定中,宪法法庭将其反应限制在关于这一关键问题的一套简短论点上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信