The Effect of Return on Asset, Return on Equity and Debt to Equity Ratio on the Value of the Manufacturing Firm Listed on Stock Exchange 2015-2019

Desmon Desmon, Armalia Wa, Meirinaldi Meirinaldi, Yudhinanto Nugroho
{"title":"The Effect of Return on Asset, Return on Equity and Debt to Equity Ratio on the Value of the Manufacturing Firm Listed on Stock Exchange 2015-2019","authors":"Desmon Desmon, Armalia Wa, Meirinaldi Meirinaldi, Yudhinanto Nugroho","doi":"10.4108/eai.30-10-2021.2315839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The motivation behind this examination is to see the impact of return on resources (ROA), return on value (ROE), and obligation to value proportion (DER) on an organization's worth (PBV). Optional information was utilized in this review, which was gained by implication by scientists through middle person media. The example for this review comprised of seven food and drink producing organizations with firm qualities recorded on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Return on resources essentially affects firm worth, while return on value has a generally negative and minor effect and obligation to value proportion has a somewhat certain and critical effect. From 2015 to 2019, a total of 35 observations were made The monetary proportion is utilized as an autonomous variable. Firm worth is the autonomous variable, though return on resources, return on value, and obligation to value proportion are the ward factors (PBV). In view of the review's discoveries, the scientific strategy utilized in this review was a different direct relapse condition, which produced the condition Y=1.860+1.303X1- 0.037X2+0.410X3+. The profit from resources, return on value, and obligation to value proportions all essentially affect firm worth, as indicated by the review's discoveries. Return on resources advantageously affects firm worth, while return on value has a somewhat negative and minor effect, and obligation to value proportion hugely affects firm worth.","PeriodicalId":185251,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First Multidiscipline International Conference, MIC 2021, October 30 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First Multidiscipline International Conference, MIC 2021, October 30 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-10-2021.2315839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. The motivation behind this examination is to see the impact of return on resources (ROA), return on value (ROE), and obligation to value proportion (DER) on an organization's worth (PBV). Optional information was utilized in this review, which was gained by implication by scientists through middle person media. The example for this review comprised of seven food and drink producing organizations with firm qualities recorded on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Return on resources essentially affects firm worth, while return on value has a generally negative and minor effect and obligation to value proportion has a somewhat certain and critical effect. From 2015 to 2019, a total of 35 observations were made The monetary proportion is utilized as an autonomous variable. Firm worth is the autonomous variable, though return on resources, return on value, and obligation to value proportion are the ward factors (PBV). In view of the review's discoveries, the scientific strategy utilized in this review was a different direct relapse condition, which produced the condition Y=1.860+1.303X1- 0.037X2+0.410X3+. The profit from resources, return on value, and obligation to value proportions all essentially affect firm worth, as indicated by the review's discoveries. Return on resources advantageously affects firm worth, while return on value has a somewhat negative and minor effect, and obligation to value proportion hugely affects firm worth.
2015-2019年制造业上市公司资产收益率、净资产收益率和负债权益比对价值的影响
. 这种检查背后的动机是看到资源回报(ROA)、价值回报(ROE)和价值义务比例(DER)对组织价值(PBV)的影响。本综述使用了选择性信息,这些信息是由科学家通过中间人媒介暗示获得的。本次审查的例子包括印度尼西亚证券交易所记录的七个质量稳定的食品和饮料生产组织。资源回报从本质上影响企业价值,而价值回报的影响一般为负的、次要的,价值义务比例的影响具有一定的、关键性的作用。从2015年到2019年,共进行了35次观察,其中货币比例作为自主变量。企业价值是自主变量,而资源收益率、价值收益率和价值义务比例是自主变量。鉴于本综述的发现,本综述采用的科学策略是不同的直接复发条件,产生条件Y=1.860+1.303X1- 0.037X2+0.410X3+。从资源中获得的利润、价值回报和价值比例的义务都从本质上影响着公司的价值,正如审查的发现所表明的那样。资源回报对企业价值有有利影响,价值回报对企业价值有一定的负向影响,价值义务比例对企业价值有较大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信