Face Quality Estimation and Its Correlation to Demographic and Non-Demographic Bias in Face Recognition

P. Terhorst, J. Kolf, N. Damer, Florian Kirchbuchner, Arjan Kuijper
{"title":"Face Quality Estimation and Its Correlation to Demographic and Non-Demographic Bias in Face Recognition","authors":"P. Terhorst, J. Kolf, N. Damer, Florian Kirchbuchner, Arjan Kuijper","doi":"10.1109/IJCB48548.2020.9304865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Face quality assessment aims at estimating the utility of a face image for the purpose of recognition. It is a key factor to achieve high face recognition performances. Currently, the high performance of these face recognition systems come with the cost of a strong bias against demographic and non-demographic sub-groups. Recent work has shown that face quality assessment algorithms should adapt to the deployed face recognition system, in order to achieve highly accurate and robust quality estimations. However, this could lead to a bias transfer towards the face quality assessment leading to discriminatory effects e.g. during enrolment. In this work, we present an in-depth analysis of the correlation between bias in face recognition and face quality assessment. Experiments were conducted on two publicly available datasets captured under controlled and uncontrolled circumstances with two popular face embed-dings. We evaluated four state-of-the-art solutions for face quality assessment towards biases to pose, ethnicity, and age. The experiments showed that the face quality assessment solutions assign significantly lower quality values towards subgroups affected by the recognition bias demonstrating that these approaches are biased as well. This raises ethical questions towards fairness and discrimination which future works have to address.","PeriodicalId":417270,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCB48548.2020.9304865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Face quality assessment aims at estimating the utility of a face image for the purpose of recognition. It is a key factor to achieve high face recognition performances. Currently, the high performance of these face recognition systems come with the cost of a strong bias against demographic and non-demographic sub-groups. Recent work has shown that face quality assessment algorithms should adapt to the deployed face recognition system, in order to achieve highly accurate and robust quality estimations. However, this could lead to a bias transfer towards the face quality assessment leading to discriminatory effects e.g. during enrolment. In this work, we present an in-depth analysis of the correlation between bias in face recognition and face quality assessment. Experiments were conducted on two publicly available datasets captured under controlled and uncontrolled circumstances with two popular face embed-dings. We evaluated four state-of-the-art solutions for face quality assessment towards biases to pose, ethnicity, and age. The experiments showed that the face quality assessment solutions assign significantly lower quality values towards subgroups affected by the recognition bias demonstrating that these approaches are biased as well. This raises ethical questions towards fairness and discrimination which future works have to address.
人脸识别中人脸质量估计及其与人口统计学和非人口统计学偏差的关系
人脸质量评估的目的是估计人脸图像的效用,以达到识别的目的。它是实现高人脸识别性能的关键因素。目前,这些人脸识别系统的高性能是以对人口统计学和非人口统计学子群体的强烈偏见为代价的。最近的研究表明,人脸质量评估算法应该适应已部署的人脸识别系统,以实现高度准确和鲁棒的质量估计。然而,这可能导致对面部质量评估的偏见转移,从而导致歧视性影响,例如在入学期间。在这项工作中,我们深入分析了人脸识别中的偏见与人脸质量评估之间的相关性。实验是在两个公开的数据集上进行的,这些数据集是在受控和非受控的情况下用两种流行的人脸嵌入捕获的。我们评估了四种最先进的面部质量评估解决方案,以消除姿势、种族和年龄的偏见。实验表明,人脸质量评估解决方案对受识别偏差影响的子组分配的质量值明显较低,表明这些方法也是有偏差的。这就提出了关于公平和歧视的伦理问题,这是未来工作必须解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信