Ecological Attributes by Forest Types in the Natural Forest of Mt. Odae

Y. Choi, Ji Hong Kim, S. Chung
{"title":"Ecological Attributes by Forest Types in the Natural Forest of Mt. Odae","authors":"Y. Choi, Ji Hong Kim, S. Chung","doi":"10.7747/JFES.2017.33.1.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to evaluate the ecological attributes of forest types which were classified by cluster analysis in the natural forest of Mt. Odae on the basis of the vegetation data (232 sampling points) from the point-quarter sampling methods. For the classified types, the species composition was expressed by importance value to describe the stand structure and the species diversity was quantified using the Shannon’s diversity index. Recognized forest types were 1) Quercus mongolica – Pinus densiflora – Betula ermanii forest type, 2) Mixed mesophytic forest type, 3) Q. mongolica forest type, 4) B. ermanii forest type. Species diversity indices of total and overstory were highest in the Mixed mesophytic forest type (3.465 and 2.942), and lowest in the B. ermanii forest type (0.118 and 0.832). In addition to that, Q. mongolica – P. densiflora – B. ermanii forest type was calculated as 3.226 and 2.565, and Q. mongolica forest type was calculated as 2.776 and 1.218 in total and overstory, respectively. It was considered that after the P. densiflora and B. ermanii first invaded and site condition became good, Q. mongolica – P. densiflora – B. ermanii forest type was dominated by Q. mongolica. Mixed mesophytic forest type showed the most stable stand structure with various species distributed uniformly. Q. mongolica forest type would preserve the present stand status for a while, and the B. ermanii in B. ermanii forest type would be pressed by other species over time.","PeriodicalId":237267,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forest and environmental science","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forest and environmental science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7747/JFES.2017.33.1.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the ecological attributes of forest types which were classified by cluster analysis in the natural forest of Mt. Odae on the basis of the vegetation data (232 sampling points) from the point-quarter sampling methods. For the classified types, the species composition was expressed by importance value to describe the stand structure and the species diversity was quantified using the Shannon’s diversity index. Recognized forest types were 1) Quercus mongolica – Pinus densiflora – Betula ermanii forest type, 2) Mixed mesophytic forest type, 3) Q. mongolica forest type, 4) B. ermanii forest type. Species diversity indices of total and overstory were highest in the Mixed mesophytic forest type (3.465 and 2.942), and lowest in the B. ermanii forest type (0.118 and 0.832). In addition to that, Q. mongolica – P. densiflora – B. ermanii forest type was calculated as 3.226 and 2.565, and Q. mongolica forest type was calculated as 2.776 and 1.218 in total and overstory, respectively. It was considered that after the P. densiflora and B. ermanii first invaded and site condition became good, Q. mongolica – P. densiflora – B. ermanii forest type was dominated by Q. mongolica. Mixed mesophytic forest type showed the most stable stand structure with various species distributed uniformly. Q. mongolica forest type would preserve the present stand status for a while, and the B. ermanii in B. ermanii forest type would be pressed by other species over time.
五台山天然林不同森林类型的生态属性
利用点/季采样法采集的232个样点植被数据,对五台山天然林进行了聚类分析,并对森林类型进行了生态属性评价。对于分类类型,用重要值表示物种组成来描述林分结构,用Shannon多样性指数量化物种多样性。可识别的森林类型有:1)蒙古栎-密松-白桦林型,2)混合叶生植物林型,3)蒙古松林型,4)蒙古白桦林型。全林分和林分物种多样性指数最高的是混交林,分别为3.465和2.942,最低的是羊草林,分别为0.118和0.832。此外,蒙古松-密植松-德国黑桫椤林型的总林分为3.226,林分为2.565,蒙古松林分的林分为2.776,林分为1.218。认为在密桫椤和德国白桫椤首次入侵后,立地条件较好,蒙古松-密桫椤-德国白桫椤林型以蒙古松为主。混合叶生林型林分结构最稳定,各树种分布均匀。蒙古松林型会在一段时间内保持目前的林分状态,而随着时间的推移,蒙古松林型中的黑木耳会受到其他物种的挤压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信