Mediating patienthood-from an ethics of to an ethics with technology.

A. H. Kiran
{"title":"Mediating patienthood-from an ethics of to an ethics with technology.","authors":"A. H. Kiran","doi":"10.1111/nup.12153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The changes that happen to healthcare services after the implementation of new assistive healthcare technologies (also called 'welfare technology' in the Nordic countries) concern more than increased efficiency and reducing healthcare expenditure. Of particular interest from an ethical point of view are the manners in which technologies shape the roles and identities of care receivers and healthcare personnel. The notion of 'patienthood' is explored in this paper as something that is both challenged by new technologies, and as something that is opened up for active and potentially positive reshaping when care receivers support their illness or frailty with assistive healthcare technologies. This dual effect of technologies (as both challenge and opportunity) requires a rethinking of ethics of technologies, which for most part have been preoccupied with ethical issues prior to the implementation of a new technology into a healthcare service. Ethics of technology should also contribute to the concrete efforts of care receivers to establish something approximating a 'good patienthood' in relation to a new technology, making it opportune to dub it, instead, an ethics with technology. This paper explores how assistive healthcare technologies impact on care receivers and the care situation, and in relation to the notion of patienthood, before turning to what this implies for an ethics that has as its goal to support care receivers to reach a life with the technology that is in line with their own notions of well-being and a good life.","PeriodicalId":391694,"journal":{"name":"Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The changes that happen to healthcare services after the implementation of new assistive healthcare technologies (also called 'welfare technology' in the Nordic countries) concern more than increased efficiency and reducing healthcare expenditure. Of particular interest from an ethical point of view are the manners in which technologies shape the roles and identities of care receivers and healthcare personnel. The notion of 'patienthood' is explored in this paper as something that is both challenged by new technologies, and as something that is opened up for active and potentially positive reshaping when care receivers support their illness or frailty with assistive healthcare technologies. This dual effect of technologies (as both challenge and opportunity) requires a rethinking of ethics of technologies, which for most part have been preoccupied with ethical issues prior to the implementation of a new technology into a healthcare service. Ethics of technology should also contribute to the concrete efforts of care receivers to establish something approximating a 'good patienthood' in relation to a new technology, making it opportune to dub it, instead, an ethics with technology. This paper explores how assistive healthcare technologies impact on care receivers and the care situation, and in relation to the notion of patienthood, before turning to what this implies for an ethics that has as its goal to support care receivers to reach a life with the technology that is in line with their own notions of well-being and a good life.
调解耐心——从技术伦理到技术伦理。
在实施新的辅助医疗技术(在北欧国家也称为“福利技术”)之后,医疗保健服务发生的变化不仅仅是提高效率和减少医疗保健支出。从伦理的角度来看,特别感兴趣的是技术塑造护理接受者和医疗保健人员的角色和身份的方式。本文探讨了“耐心”的概念,既是新技术的挑战,也是当护理接受者用辅助医疗技术支持他们的疾病或虚弱时,为积极和潜在的积极重塑而开放的东西。技术的这种双重影响(既是挑战也是机遇)要求对技术伦理进行重新思考,在将新技术应用于医疗保健服务之前,技术伦理在很大程度上一直专注于伦理问题。技术伦理也应该有助于护理接受者的具体努力,以建立与新技术有关的近似“良好耐心”的东西,从而有机会将其称为技术伦理。本文探讨了辅助医疗技术如何影响护理接受者和护理情况,以及与耐心概念的关系,然后转向这对于一种伦理意味着什么,这种伦理的目标是支持护理接受者用符合他们自己的幸福和美好生活概念的技术实现生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信