Research Paper #6: Class Action Remedies: Cy-près; ‘An Imperfect Solution to an Impossible Problem’

P. Cashman, A. Simpson
{"title":"Research Paper #6: Class Action Remedies: Cy-près; ‘An Imperfect Solution to an Impossible Problem’","authors":"P. Cashman, A. Simpson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3765085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we revisit the recommendation of the Victorian Law Reform Commission in 2008 that the courts be given an express power to grant cy-pres remedies. We discuss the use of cy-pres remedies in class actions in the United States of America and Canada is reviewed and the existing practice of granting cy-pres distributions in limited circumstances. It is suggested that the courts should have an express statutory power to grant cy-pres remedies.","PeriodicalId":172026,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3765085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit the recommendation of the Victorian Law Reform Commission in 2008 that the courts be given an express power to grant cy-pres remedies. We discuss the use of cy-pres remedies in class actions in the United States of America and Canada is reviewed and the existing practice of granting cy-pres distributions in limited circumstances. It is suggested that the courts should have an express statutory power to grant cy-pres remedies.
研究论文#6:集体诉讼补救措施:cy - pr;“一个不可能的问题的不完美解决方案”
在本文中,我们回顾了维多利亚州法律改革委员会在2008年提出的建议,即赋予法院授予侵权救济的明确权力。我们讨论了在美利坚合众国和加拿大的集体诉讼中使用货币救济的情况,并审查了在有限情况下给予货币救济分配的现有做法。有人建议,法院应具有给予侵权救济的明确法定权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信