Long Low-profile Proximal Tibial Locking Plate for the Fixation of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Above the Prosthesis: A Pilot Study

M. Jabalameli, A. Karimi, Rahmatalah Jokar, M. Mohammadpour, H. Yahyazadeh, Sina Talebi
{"title":"Long Low-profile Proximal Tibial Locking Plate for the Fixation of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Above the Prosthesis: A Pilot Study","authors":"M. Jabalameli, A. Karimi, Rahmatalah Jokar, M. Mohammadpour, H. Yahyazadeh, Sina Talebi","doi":"10.32598/jrosj.8.3.771.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anatomic distal femoral plates locking compression plate (LCP) are generally used for the fixation of distal femoral fractures. However, they are not suitable for periprosthetic femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), mainly owing to the impingement with prosthesis. Objectives: In this case series, we report the outcome of proximal tibial LCP fixation in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture after TKA. Patients and Methods: Twelve patients with a periprosthetic femoral fracture who underwent surgical treatment were included. According to Su et al. classification, all fractures were type II, originating from the femoral component with proximal extending. Fractures were managed with open reduction and plate fixation. The plate choice was either a long low-profile proximal tibial LCP (n=9) or a short anatomic distal femoral LCP (n=3). Results: The study population included one male and 11 females with a mean age of 74.5±9.3 years and a mean follow-up of 2.8±1.3 years. Union of fracture was observed in all fractures that were fixed with a long locking plate during a mean period of 3.1±2.1 months. Fixation failed in all three patients who were managed with a short plate. These patients underwent revision surgery with a long low-profile proximal tibial LCP. In one of them, the fixation failed again and finally fixed with tumor prosthesis. The other two fractures were united with no complications. Conclusion: Long low-profile proximal tibial LCP omits the problem of impingement by prosthesis, which is caused by short anatomic distal femoral LCP in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures above the prosthesis. However, future large-scale comparative studies are required before we can recommend it for routine implications in these fractures.","PeriodicalId":286829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jrosj.8.3.771.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anatomic distal femoral plates locking compression plate (LCP) are generally used for the fixation of distal femoral fractures. However, they are not suitable for periprosthetic femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), mainly owing to the impingement with prosthesis. Objectives: In this case series, we report the outcome of proximal tibial LCP fixation in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture after TKA. Patients and Methods: Twelve patients with a periprosthetic femoral fracture who underwent surgical treatment were included. According to Su et al. classification, all fractures were type II, originating from the femoral component with proximal extending. Fractures were managed with open reduction and plate fixation. The plate choice was either a long low-profile proximal tibial LCP (n=9) or a short anatomic distal femoral LCP (n=3). Results: The study population included one male and 11 females with a mean age of 74.5±9.3 years and a mean follow-up of 2.8±1.3 years. Union of fracture was observed in all fractures that were fixed with a long locking plate during a mean period of 3.1±2.1 months. Fixation failed in all three patients who were managed with a short plate. These patients underwent revision surgery with a long low-profile proximal tibial LCP. In one of them, the fixation failed again and finally fixed with tumor prosthesis. The other two fractures were united with no complications. Conclusion: Long low-profile proximal tibial LCP omits the problem of impingement by prosthesis, which is caused by short anatomic distal femoral LCP in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures above the prosthesis. However, future large-scale comparative studies are required before we can recommend it for routine implications in these fractures.
长低轮廓胫骨近端锁定钢板固定假体上方股骨假体周围骨折:一项初步研究
背景:解剖型股骨远端钢板锁定加压钢板(LCP)通常用于股骨远端骨折的固定。然而,它们不适合全膝关节置换术(TKA)后股骨假体周围骨折,主要是由于假体的撞击。目的:在本病例系列中,我们报告胫骨近端LCP固定治疗全膝关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的结果。患者和方法:12例经手术治疗的股骨假体周围骨折患者。根据Su等人的分类,所有骨折均为II型,起源于股骨假体并近端延伸。骨折采用切开复位钢板固定。钢板选择为长而低轮廓的胫骨近端LCP (n=9)或短解剖性股骨远端LCP (n=3)。结果:研究人群男性1例,女性11例,平均年龄74.5±9.3岁,平均随访2.8±1.3年。所有采用长锁定钢板固定的骨折均愈合,平均时间为3.1±2.1个月。使用短钢板治疗的3例患者均未成功固定。这些患者接受了长而低轮廓的胫骨近端LCP翻修手术。其中一例再次固定失败,最终用肿瘤假体固定。其余2例骨折愈合,无并发症。结论:在治疗假体上方股骨假体周围骨折时,较长的低轮廓胫骨近端LCP可避免股骨远端解剖性短LCP造成假体撞击的问题。然而,在我们将其推荐用于此类骨折的常规应用之前,还需要进行大规模的比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信