A comparison of backpropagation and LVQ: A case study of lung sound recognition

Fadhilah Syafria, A. Buono, B. P. Silalahi
{"title":"A comparison of backpropagation and LVQ: A case study of lung sound recognition","authors":"Fadhilah Syafria, A. Buono, B. P. Silalahi","doi":"10.1109/ICACSIS.2014.7065873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One way to evaluate the state of the lungs is by listening to breath sounds using stethoscope. This technique is known as auscultation. This technique is fairly simple and inexpensive, but it has some disadvantage. They are the results of subjective analysis, human hearing is less sensitive to low frequency, environmental noise and pattern of lung sounds that almost similar. Because of these factors, misdiagnosis can occur if procedure of auscultation is not done properly. In this research, will be made a model of lung sound recognition with neural network approach. Artificial neural network method used is Backpropagation (BP) and learning Vector Quantization (LVQ). Comparison of these two methods performed to determine and recommend algorithms which provide better recognition accuracy of speech recognition in the case of lung sounds. In addition to the above two methods, the method of Mel Frequency Cepstrum Coefficient (MFCC) is also used as method of feature extraction. The results show the accuracy of using Backpropagation is 93.17%, while the value of using the LVQ is 86.88%. It can be concluded that the introduction of lung sounds using Backpropagation method gives better performance compared to the LVQ method for speech recognition cases of lung sounds.","PeriodicalId":443250,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information System","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS.2014.7065873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

One way to evaluate the state of the lungs is by listening to breath sounds using stethoscope. This technique is known as auscultation. This technique is fairly simple and inexpensive, but it has some disadvantage. They are the results of subjective analysis, human hearing is less sensitive to low frequency, environmental noise and pattern of lung sounds that almost similar. Because of these factors, misdiagnosis can occur if procedure of auscultation is not done properly. In this research, will be made a model of lung sound recognition with neural network approach. Artificial neural network method used is Backpropagation (BP) and learning Vector Quantization (LVQ). Comparison of these two methods performed to determine and recommend algorithms which provide better recognition accuracy of speech recognition in the case of lung sounds. In addition to the above two methods, the method of Mel Frequency Cepstrum Coefficient (MFCC) is also used as method of feature extraction. The results show the accuracy of using Backpropagation is 93.17%, while the value of using the LVQ is 86.88%. It can be concluded that the introduction of lung sounds using Backpropagation method gives better performance compared to the LVQ method for speech recognition cases of lung sounds.
反向传播与LVQ的比较:以肺部声音识别为例
评估肺部状况的一种方法是用听诊器听呼吸音。这种技术被称为听诊。这种技术相当简单和便宜,但是它有一些缺点。它们是主观分析的结果,人的听觉对低频不太敏感,环境噪声与肺部发出的声音模式几乎相似。由于这些因素,如果听诊程序不正确,可能会发生误诊。本研究将利用神经网络方法建立一个肺声识别模型。采用的人工神经网络方法有反向传播(BP)和学习向量量化(LVQ)。对这两种方法进行比较,以确定和推荐在肺音情况下提供更好识别精度的语音识别算法。除了以上两种方法外,还使用Mel Frequency倒频谱系数(MFCC)方法作为特征提取的方法。结果表明,反向传播法的准确率为93.17%,LVQ法的准确率为86.88%。由此可见,在肺音语音识别案例中,使用反向传播方法引入肺音的效果优于LVQ方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信