Investigating 'Internet Crimes Against Children' (ICAC) cases in the state of Florida

Bob Breeden, J. Mulholland
{"title":"Investigating 'Internet Crimes Against Children' (ICAC) cases in the state of Florida","authors":"Bob Breeden, J. Mulholland","doi":"10.1145/1141277.1141345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to highlight efforts by the Computer Crime Center at the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) to prosecute ICAC cases under their jurisdiction. Section 1 presents an overview of the FDLE ICAC Initiative, a project funded by the Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) with respect to: (i) project goals and objectives, (ii) agent/analyst training and deployment, (iii) collaboration with other law enforcement agencies, (iv) arrest rates, and (v) community education programs. Section 2 focuses on the Internet and how it is contributing to the rising incidence of sexual exploitation of children by online predators. In particular, this section underscores the computer's appeal for both the offender and the victim. Section 3 describes noteworthy cases that have been investigated by the FDLE Computer Crime Center. The first three sections provide the context for the last two sections which focus exclusively on the type of forensics required to successfully prosecute ICAC cases. In section 4, the main investigative steps are delineated. To illustrate how ICAC cases are handled, the article depicts the two main components of an investigation: First, subpoenas are issued, search warrants are served and executed, and then, once the evidence is acquired, law enforcement officials conduct a forensic exam on the computers and other digital evidence that may have been seized during an investigation. Finally, section 5 concludes with a set of recommendations on 'best practices' for prosecuting ICAC cases.","PeriodicalId":269830,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing","volume":"494 1-2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1141277.1141345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to highlight efforts by the Computer Crime Center at the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) to prosecute ICAC cases under their jurisdiction. Section 1 presents an overview of the FDLE ICAC Initiative, a project funded by the Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) with respect to: (i) project goals and objectives, (ii) agent/analyst training and deployment, (iii) collaboration with other law enforcement agencies, (iv) arrest rates, and (v) community education programs. Section 2 focuses on the Internet and how it is contributing to the rising incidence of sexual exploitation of children by online predators. In particular, this section underscores the computer's appeal for both the offender and the victim. Section 3 describes noteworthy cases that have been investigated by the FDLE Computer Crime Center. The first three sections provide the context for the last two sections which focus exclusively on the type of forensics required to successfully prosecute ICAC cases. In section 4, the main investigative steps are delineated. To illustrate how ICAC cases are handled, the article depicts the two main components of an investigation: First, subpoenas are issued, search warrants are served and executed, and then, once the evidence is acquired, law enforcement officials conduct a forensic exam on the computers and other digital evidence that may have been seized during an investigation. Finally, section 5 concludes with a set of recommendations on 'best practices' for prosecuting ICAC cases.
在佛罗里达州调查“针对儿童的网络犯罪”(ICAC)案件
这篇文章的目的是强调佛罗里达州执法部电脑罪案中心在其管辖范围内检控廉署案件的工作。第一部分概述了FDLE廉政倡议,这是一个由佛罗里达州儿童和家庭部(DCF)资助的项目,涉及:(i)项目目标和目的,(ii)特工/分析师培训和部署,(iii)与其他执法机构的合作,(iv)逮捕率,以及(v)社区教育计划。第2部分侧重于互联网以及它如何导致网络掠夺者对儿童进行性剥削的发生率上升。特别是,这一部分强调了计算机对罪犯和受害者的吸引力。第3节描述了FDLE计算机犯罪中心调查过的值得注意的案件。前三节为后两节提供背景,后两节专门介绍成功检控廉署案件所需的法证方法。在第4节中,描述了主要的调查步骤。为了说明廉署如何处理案件,文章描述了调查的两个主要组成部分:首先,发出传票,送达和执行搜查令,然后,在取得证据后,执法人员对在调查过程中可能缴获的电脑和其他数字证据进行法医检验。最后,第五部分就廉署检控案件的“最佳做法”提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信